Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 6631 (JHR)

RAVIN KUMAR ALIAS RAVIN KUMAR SAH v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./3150/2025 · 2025-04-22

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:JHHC:11916] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.3150 of 2025 ------ Ravin Kumar @ Ravin Kumar Sah, aged 34 years, S/o Basudeo Sah, R/o Village- Jamaldipur, Post- Usmanpur, & P.S Khanekbazar, District- Bhagalpur (Bihar). .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. P.A.S. Pati, Advocate For the State : Mr. Shailesh Kr. Sinha, Addl.P.P ------ Order No.02 Dated-22-04-2025 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Poraiyahat P.S. Case No.48 of 2024 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 406/420 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner has fabricated the document of a truck and is claiming ownership on the basis of the same. It is next submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is then submitted that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent as mentioned in para-11 of the instant bail application. It is then submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 08.01.2025 as mentioned in para-1 of the instant bail application. It is further submitted that the co-accused person, with similar allegation, has already been given the privileges of anticipatory bail by this Court vide order dated 15.01.2025 passed in A.B.A. No.66 of 2025. It is also submitted that the petitioner undertakes to co-operate with the trial of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner also undertakes that he will not annoy or disturb the informant or any of the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned Addl.P.P. appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned SDJM, Godda in connection with Poraiyahat P.S. Case No.48 of 2024 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and he will not annoy or disturb the informant or any of the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Saroj/