BABUAPPA TATYAAPPA SALEGAONKAR AND OTHERS v. HOTEL MUNNA WINE BAR THROUGH ITS PROP KISHOR MOTILAL JAISWAL AND OTHERS
CA/9298/2025 · 2025-11-04
Shri Arun R Pedneker
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 66304 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 66304 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1 953 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 953 WRIT PETITION NO. 6851 OF 2025 HOTEL MUNNA WINE BAR THROUGH ITS PROP KISHOR MOTILAL JAISWAL VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND ANOTHER ... WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 9298 OF 2025 IN WP/6851/2025 … Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. Ajit Manohar Gholap AGP for Respondent/State: Mr. D. R. Korade Advocate for Intervenor: Mr. A. T. Jadhavar …
CORAM : ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J. DATE : 04.11.2025 PER COURT:
1. This court for the reasons noted in order dated 04.06.2025, granted interim relief in terms of prayer clause “C” as this court is of the view that without hearing the petitioner his license was suspended. However, adjudication on the notice Exhbit- B, dated 29.05.2025 is still pending before the Collector, Parbhani.
2. The learned counsel for the parties submitted before this court that interim protection granted be continued for the period of eight (08)weeks and the Collector concerned be directed 2025:BHC-AUG:30212
2 953 to decide the notice dated 29.05.2025 within a period of eight (08) weeks from the date of the production of the order.
3. The learned AGP submits that the proceedings would be concluded within eight (08) weeks. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner would co-operate in deciding the proceedings before the Collector, Parbhani.
4. Considering the above submissions, the concerned authority to decide the proceedings within eight (08) weeks. The protection granted earlier by this court would continue to operate till conclusion of the proceedings and also further for a period up till two (02) weeks thereafter.
5. With the above observations, the Writ Petition stands
disposed of.
6. In view of disposal of the writ petition, pending civil application is also disposed of.
[ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J.] marathe