108 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-5709-2025 Date of Decision: 15.07.2025 Navi Kumar and others ..... Petitioners Versus The State of Punjab and others .......Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BHARDWAJ Present: Mr. Ritesh Tomar, Advocate, for the petitioners. Rajesh Bhardwaj, J. (ORAL) Prayer in the present petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India is for issuance of direction to the official respondents to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners and their family members, which is in danger at the hands of private respondents. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that petitioner No.5 wants to transfer his property in the names of his grandsons, however, the family members of his daughter i.e. respondents No.6 to 12 are opposing the same. He submits that on the earlier occasion, the petitioners were attacked on their behest. He submits that petitioner No.2 filed a representation dated 26.04.2025 (Annexure P-2) before respondent No.4, but no action has been taken on the same till date. Notice of motion. Mr. J.S. Arora, DAG, Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of the State. After hearing learned counsel for the parties, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.4 i.e. Senior Superintendent of Police, Khanna to decide the representation dated 26.04.2025 (Annexure P-2) within a period of one month from today, in accordance with law and provide appropriate security to the petitioners, in case any threat is perceived to them. It is being clarified that this order shall not be taken to grant immunity to the petitioners for legal action for violation of law, if any, committed by them. (RAJESH BHARDWAJ) 15.07.2025 JUDGE sharmila Whether Speaking/Reasoned : Yes/No Whether Reportable : Yes/No SHARMILA DEVI 2025.07.15 18:41 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment PHHC