2025:UHC:5488 IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR VERMA 27th JUNE, 2025 ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 506 OF 2025 Shahzad and Another ..... Applicants Versus State of Uttarakhand ..…Respondent Counsel for the Applicants : Mr. Mohd. Safdar, Advocate. Counsel for the Respondent : Mr. Pradeep Lohani, Brief Holder. Hon’ble Alok Kumar Verma,J. The Applicants have filed the present Application for anticipatory bail in Case Crime No. 383 of 2025, registered at Kotwali Manglaur, District Haridwar under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 304(2), 324(2) and Section 352 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. 2. According to the First Information Report dated 07.05.2025, on 04.05.2025 at around 10.30 p.m., two unknown persons beat the informant and his wife. They broke his wife’s mangalsutra & the informant’s golden chain and Rs.7,000/- were taken by them. 3. Heard Mr. Mohd. Safdar, learned counsel for the applicants and Mr. Pradeep Lohani, learned Brief Holder for the respondent. 4. Mr. Mohd. Safdar, Advocate, contended that the applicants have been falsely implicated in the present 1 2025:UHC:5488 matter. They were not present on the spot. They have no criminal antecedents. They are permanent residents of District Haridwar, therefore, there is no chance of their absconding. They were granted interim bail on 22.05.2025, and, the conditions of the interim bail have not been violated by them. 5. Mr. Pradeep Lohani, Brief Holder for the respondent has opposed the anticipatory bail application orally. 6. Personal liberty under Article 21 of the Constitution of India is very precious fundamental right and it should be curtailed only when it becomes imperative according to the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case. 7. Having heard the submissions of learned counsel for the parties and keeping in view of the facts and circumstances of the case, without commenting on the merits of the case, the present Anticipatory Bail Application is allowed and the order dated 22.05.2025, granting interim bail to the applicants, is made absolute. It is directed that in the event of arrest of the applicants Shahzad and Murad Ali, they shall be released on anticipatory bail on executing a personal bond of Rs. 30,000/- and two reliable sureties, each of the like 2 2025:UHC:5488 amount, by each one of them, to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer, subject to the following conditions:- (i) Applicants shall cooperate with the Investigating Agency and they shall make themselves available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required; (ii) If the charge-sheet is filed, the applicants shall attend the trial court regularly and they shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment; (iii) Applicants shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person, acquainted with the facts of this case. (iv) Applicants shall not leave the country without the previous permission of the trial court. 8. It is made clear that if the applicants misuse or violate any of the conditions, imposed upon them, the prosecution agency will be free to move the Court for cancellation of the anticipatory bail. ___________________ ALOK KUMAR VERMA, J. Dt: 27.06.2025 Shiv/ 3