IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT Amanpreet Singh and others State of Haryana CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI Present : Mr. Mr. Vikram Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner Mr. DEEPAK SIBAL Learned counsel for the petitioner would be satisfied if the present Deputy Commissioner, decision on the and P-2), made on behalf of the petitioner 2. Learned State counsel, who appears on advance notice, has no objection if the above prayer is 3. Accordingly, at this stage, without commenting on case, the present take a decision on the passing a speaking order and after affording opportunity of hearing to all concerned, preferably within order. 4. Needless to add that the decision so taken be petitioners and if the decisio would be at liberty to challenge the same, in accordance with law. May 28, 2025 vandana Whether speaking/reasoned : Whether reportable : Sr. No.153 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-16130- Date of Decision : Amanpreet Singh and others Versus Haryana and others HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI Mr. Sukhdev Singh, Advocate for Mr. Vikram Singh, Advocate, or the petitioners. Mr. P.P.Chahar, Senior DAG, Haryana. *** DEEPAK SIBAL, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioners be satisfied if the present petition is disposed of with a direction to Deputy Commissioner, Ambala District Ambala decision on the representations dated 16.04.2025 and ), made on behalf of the petitioners. Learned State counsel, who appears on advance notice, has no objection if the above prayer is accepted. Accordingly, at this stage, without commenting on case, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No. take a decision on the afore representations made on behalf of the petitioners speaking order and after affording opportunity of hearing to all concerned, preferably within two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this Needless to add that the decision so taken be and if the decision is not to the satisfaction of the petitioner would be at liberty to challenge the same, in accordance with law. (DEEPAK SIBAL JUDGE (LAPITA BANERJI) JUDGE speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No p. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT -2025 (O&M) Date of Decision : 28.05.2025 …Petitioners …Respondents DEEPAK SIBAL HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI P.Chahar, Senior DAG, Haryana. s submits that at this stage, he petition is disposed of with a direction to the Ambala-respondent No.2 to take a 16.04.2025 and 26.05.2025 (Annexures P-1 Learned State counsel, who appears on advance notice, has no Accordingly, at this stage, without commenting on the merits of the petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2 to ade on behalf of the petitioners, by speaking order and after affording opportunity of hearing to all from the date of receipt of a copy of this Needless to add that the decision so taken be communicated to the n is not to the satisfaction of the petitioners, they would be at liberty to challenge the same, in accordance with law. DEEPAK SIBAL) JUDGE (LAPITA BANERJI) JUDGE VANDANA 2025.05.31 10:28 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document