Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 6626 (PNJ)

AMIT CHAUHAN @ AMIT v. STATE OF HARYANA

CRM-M/69707/2025 · 2026-03-18

Vinod S Bhardwaj

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA 108 Amit Chauhan @ Amit State of Haryana CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Present :- Mr. for the petitioner. Ms. Chhavi Sharma, Astt. AG, Haryana ASI None for the complainant. VINOD S. BHARDWAJ CRM-50058-2025 Allowed, as prayed for, subject to all just exceptions. Main case The instant petition has been filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 the petitioner in case under Section 316(2), 318(4) of the Station Baldev Nagar, District Ambala 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner pursuant to the order dated has joined investigation and is no lo case. 3. Learned State counsel on instructions corroborates the said averment and submits that the custodial interrogation of the petitioner is not required for the purpose of investigation. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-69707 Date of decision: Amit Chauhan @ Amit VERSUS Haryana and another HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD S. BHARDWAJ Mr. Rahul Chauhan and Mr. Paras Choudhary, Advocates for the petitioner. Ms. Chhavi Sharma, Astt. AG, Haryana ASI Karan Singh, No.269, P.S. Baldev Nagar, Ambala. None for the complainant. ***** VINOD S. BHARDWAJ, J. (Oral) 2025 Allowed, as prayed for, subject to all just exceptions. The instant petition has been filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for grant of anticipatory bail to petitioner in case bearing FIR No.346 316(2), 318(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Baldev Nagar, District Ambala. Learned counsel for the petitioner pursuant to the order dated 23.02.2026 passed by this Court, the petitioner has joined investigation and is no longer required for investigation of the Learned State counsel on instructions corroborates the said averment and submits that the custodial interrogation of the petitioner is not required for the purpose of investigation. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 69707-2025 (O&M) Date of decision: 18.03.2026 ...Petitioner ...Respondent VINOD S. BHARDWAJ Rahul Chauhan and Mr. Paras Choudhary, Advocates Ms. Chhavi Sharma, Astt. AG, Haryana with Baldev Nagar, Ambala. Allowed, as prayed for, subject to all just exceptions. The instant petition has been filed under Section 482 of the for grant of anticipatory bail to dated 17.11.2025 registered Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 at Police Learned counsel for the petitioner inter alia contends that passed by this Court, the petitioner nger required for investigation of the Learned State counsel on instructions from ASI Karan Singh, corroborates the said averment and submits that the custodial interrogation of the petitioner is not required for the purpose of investigation. SUMIT SINGH GUSAIN 2026.03.18 18:17 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 2 108 CRM-M-69707-2025 (O&M) 4. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 5. Since the petitioner has joined the investigation and his custodial interrogation is not required, the present petition is allowed and the interim order dated 23.02.2026 is made absolute. 6. However, if required, the petitioner(s) shall continue to join investigation as and when required to do so and shall abide by the terms and conditions, as laid down under Section 482 (2) BNSS. (VINOD S. BHARDWAJ) 18.03.2026 JUDGE Sumit Gusain Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No SUMIT SINGH GUSAIN 2026.03.18 18:17 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document