Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 66256 (ALL)

SHRI UDAI NARAYAN YADAV v. STATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

NA529/1828/2025 · 2025-07-06

Nalin Kumar Srivastava

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:105769 Court No. - 83 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 529 BNSS No. - 1828 of 2025 Applicant :- Shri Udai Narayan Yadav Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Ankit Tiwari,Rajan Babu Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Nalin Kumar Srivastava,J. 1. This application under Section 529 BNSS has been filed with a prayer to direct the court concerned to decide the Criminal Case No. 3359 of 2012 in case crime no. 126 of 2011 under Sections 323, 325, 504, 506, 427 I.P.C., Police Station- Thana Baragaon, District- Varanasi pending in the Court of learned A.C.J.M-VII, Varanasi expeditiously within stipulated period. 2. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. for the State. 3. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the applicant that the said criminal case is pending since 2018 and after framing of charge in the year 2014 the case is pending at the stage of prosecution evidence. It is further submitted that the applicant who is the informant is appearing before the Court but the learned trial Court appears be be a little some reluctant to record the evidence in this matter. The Court concerned is not taking proper interest in disposal of the said case. 4. Learned AGA opposed the prayer. 5. I have considered the submissions and perused the record. 6. In the circumstances, keeping in view the fact that the matter is very old and pertains to the category of critically old cases, the Court concerned is directed to summon the witnesses and record their evidences vigilantly and try to dispose of this case expeditiously preferably within a period of one year from the date of production of certified copy of this order before it, keeping in view the heavy work load in the said Court. 7. It is also made clear that the Court / Presiding Officer is not the only stake holder in the trial and disposal of a case, hence, besides the P.O. concerned, all the stake holders i.e. police and executive authorities, counsels, parties to the case, staff etc. are also made bound by this order and it will be their responsibility also to assist the Court in every manner for the expeditious disposal of this case. 8. With the above observations, the application stands disposed of. Order Date :- 7.7.2025 Fhd Digitally signed by :- FAHAD NIYAZ High Court of Judicature at Allahabad