INDERPREET KAUR MUNJAL v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS
CRWP/5706/2025 · 2025-06-09
Kirti Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 66228 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 66228 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CRWP-5706-2025 (O&M) 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Sr. No.116
CRWP-5706-2025 (O&M) Date of decision : 09.06.2025
Inderpreet Kaur Munjal
..... Petitioner
VERSUS
State of Punjab and others
..... Respondents
CORAM: HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE KIRTI SINGH
Present: Mr. Ramneek Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Adhiraj Singh, AAG, Punjab. Mr. Vishal Aggarwal, Advocate, for the respondents. ***** KIRTI SINGH, J. (Oral)
1. The instant petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India has been filed for directions to the official respondents to protect the life and liberty of the petitioner from the private respondents. 2. At the very outset, learned State counsel while referring to the status report by way of an affidavit of Jaswinder Singh (PPS), Asstt. Commissioner of Police (Crime against Women & Children), Amritsar City on behalf of respondents No.1 to 4 submits that after enquiring into the facts and circumstances of the case, a detailed report dated 02.06.2025 was submitted by the deponent, recommending to consign the application of the petitioner to the record room as the allegations of the petitioner were not proved, relevant portion of which reads thus:-
“The enquiry conducted so far, it has found that applicant Inderpreet Kaur had a friendship with Jaspreet Singh son of Tejinder Singh, resident of H.No.590, Gali Mast Khoo Chowk Moni, Police Station C Division, Amritsar and when Ramandeep Singh 2025.06.10 13:08 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CRWP-5706-2025 (O&M) 2
the talks on the marriage could not be materialized, the applicant Inderpreet Kaur along with her mother went to the house of Jarnail Singh Dhot for solving matter, which is proved from the statement of the applicant Inderpreet Kaur. Thereafter applicant gave different applications against Jaspreet Singh and his sister Gursifat Kaur, where Jarnail Singh Dhot accompanied Jaspreet Singh and Gursifat Kaur as a councilor for solving the matter, due to which Inderpreet Kaur filed an applications against Jarnail Singh Dhot that he in connivance with Paramjit Kaur, Ranjit Kaur, Jaspinder Kaur and Harmeet Kaur had indulged her in prostitution and forced her to do prostitution work at hotel Golden Blessing but during the enquiry/secret enquiry, no such fact was found. The respondent Paramjit Kaur, Harmeet Kaur and Ranjit Kaur also presented one photocopy of compromise effected between them and Inderpreet Kaur at Police Station D-division. During the enquiry, no such fact relating to the allegations alleged by the applicant is found.
The applications No. UID No. 2168657 dated 19.10.2021, UID No. 2168657 dated 19.10.2021, UID No. 2180496 dated 29.10.2021, 2079 HRC dated 10.08.2022, 2299 HRC dated 09.09.2022 filed by the applicant Inderpreet Kaur against Jaspreet Singh and Gursifat Kaur and photocopy of RTI relating application No. 146192 PGD dated 14.04.2023 presented by Jaspreet Singh is attached herewith for the kind perusal."
It is further submitted that the aforesaid report is pending in the office of Addl. Deputy Commissioner of Police (Headquarter), Amritsar City and it will be submitted in the office of respondent No.3 for the final approval. 3. In view of the above submissions made by learned State counsel, no further order is required to be passed in the present petition. Ramandeep Singh 2025.06.10 13:08 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CRWP-5706-2025 (O&M) 3
4. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stands
disposed of.
(KIRTI SINGH)
JUDGE
09.06.2025 Ramandeep Singh
Whether speaking / reasoned
Yes/No Whether Reportable
Yes/No
Ramandeep Singh 2025.06.10 13:08 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document