Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 6622 (RAJ)

PRITAM @ PRADEEP S/O PRABHULAL v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/2082/2025 · 2025-02-12

Vinod Kumar Bharwani

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:6084] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous 2nd Bail Application No. 2082/2025 Pritam @ Pradeep S/o Prabhulal, Aged About 24 Years, R/o Aamli, Police Station Atru, District Baran (Raj.) (At Present In District Jail, Baran) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Jagdish Singh Chauhan For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Shekhawat, P.P. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI Order 12/02/2025 The 2nd bail application has been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C./483 B.N.S.S. on behalf of accused-petitioner in the matter arising out of F.I.R. No.278/2024 registered at Police Station Atru District Baran (Raj.) for the offence(s) punishable under Section(s) 115(2), 126(2), 110, 118(1), 118(2), 333, 119(1), 324(4), 324(5) & 3(5) of B.N.S. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the case, he has nothing to do with the alleged offence and he is behind the bars since 11.08.2024. Counsel further submits that the statement(s) of injured, namely Surendra Kumar Suman has already been recorded. The other co- accused person, namely Surendra Mohan @ Neta has already been granted bail by this Court. Trial of the case is likely to take a long time to conclude, till then, his further incarceration would not [2025:RJ-JP:6084] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-2082/2025] serve any fruitful purpose and he is ready and willing to furnish his bail bonds. Therefore, the 2nd bail application deserves to be allowed. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the material made available on record. Taking into consideration the submissions put forth and overall facts & circumstances of the case but without commenting upon detailed merits of the case, this Court deems it fit to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail. Therefore, the 2nd bail application is allowed. The accused- petitioner, namely Pritam @ Pradeep S/o Prabhulal, shall be released on bail, if he is not required in any other case, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Fifty Thousand) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty-five Thousand) each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any other court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when he is called upon to do so. (VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI),J SAURABH /29