Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 6622 (AP)

Kavadi Narayana, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,

WP/3245/2025 · 2025-02-07

Gannamaneni Ramakrishna Prasad

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 APHC010062732025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3328] FRIDAY ,THE SEVENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO: 3245/2025 Between: 1. KAVADI NARAYANA,, S/O PEDDA KONDAIAH, AGE 43 YEARS, R/O ST COLONY, RANGASAMUDRAM REVENUE VILLAGE, PORUMAMILLA MANDAL, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT, KADAPA. 3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, BADVEL REVENUE DIVISION, KADAPA DISTRICT. 4. TAHSILDAR, PORUMAMILLA MANDAL, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. S SRINIVASA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: 2 ORAL ORDER: Heard Sri N. Rupeshwar Reddy, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of Sri S. Srinivasa Rao, learned Counsel for the Writ Petitioner and Sri K. Arjun Chowdhary, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for all the Respondents. 2. Learned Counsel for the Writ Petitioner has drawn the attention of this Court to the Representation submitted by the Writ Petitioner dated 07.11.2024 (Ex.P.1). 3. Having considered the facts and circumstances of this case, this Court deems it appropriate to dispose of this Writ Petition, at the admission stage, without going into the merit, directing the Tahsildar, Porumamilla Mandal (Respondent No.4) to consider the Representation submitted by the Writ Petitioner dated 07.11.2024 (Ex.P.1) and pass a Speaking Order within a period of six weeks from today in accordance with law and communicate a copy of such Order to the Writ Petitioner forthwith. 4. Needless to state that the Respondent No.4 is statutorily obligated to adhere to the principles of Natural Justice by issuing advance Notice to all the interested parties including the Writ Petitioner herein, consider their submissions/objections and documents, if any, before passing the final order. 5. Writ Petitioner is directed to submit a copy of this Order along with the photocopy of the Representation (mentioned supra) to Respondent No.4 within one week from today, for effective compliance. 6. With these observations and directions, this Writ Petition stands disposed of. No order as to costs. 7. Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand closed in terms of this order. ______________________________________ GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD, J Dt: 07.02.2025 Vns