ABDUL SAMAD PANDIT AND ORS. v. UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K AND ORS. (INDUSTRIES AND COMMERCE)
WP(C)/584/2025 · 2025-03-18
Moksha Khajuria Kazmi
Writ Petition (Civil)body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 6621 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 6621 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Serial No. 106 Suppl. List
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR
WP(C) No. 584/2025
Abdul Samad Pandit and Ors. ….. Appellant/petitioner(s) Through: - Mr. S. A. Qadri, Advocate
V/s UT of J&K and Ors. ….. Respondent(s) Through: - Mr. Furqan Yaqoob, GA
CORAM:
HON’BLE MS JUSTICE MOKSHA KHAJURIA KAZMI, JUDGE
(ORDER) 18.03.2025
In the instant petition, petitioners are seeking direction upon respondents to release their gratuity, other benefits and settle their grievances in terms of representations filed by them from time to time.
It is stated that petitioners were working in a Match Factory, Baramulla, Government decided to transfer the said Unit to M/s WIMCO Ltd., Bombay along with its machinery and buildings existing thereon within the premises of the Match Factory, including the entire staff working in the Unit on the terms and conditions of their employment. It was also decided that the dues on account of G. P. Fund, gratuity etc., admissible under the rules of Corporation, would be paid by J&K Industries Limited. The petitioners made representations for implementation of the Cabinet Decision No. 251 dated 26.10.1989 and the order passed by this Mohammad Yaseen Dar I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document
Court on 26.10.1988, for settling their grievances, however, unfortunately no heed has been paid by the respondents till date.
Learned counsel for the petitioners’ states that petitioners would feel satisfied if the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to consider the representations having been made by the petitioners from time to time, copies whereof are enclosed with the instant petition, within a reasonable period of time. Learned counsel for the respondents is not averse to the proposition made by the learned counsel for the petitioners.
In view of above, the instant petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to consider the representations made by the petitioners from time to time within a period of three months from the date copy of this order, writ petition along with its annexures are served upon respondents.
Disposed of along with connected CM(s).
(MOKSHA KHAJURIA KAZMI)
JUDGE SRINAGAR 18.03.2025
“Mohammad Yasin Dar”
Mohammad Yaseen Dar I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document