Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Gujarat · body

2025 DAILYLAW 6621 (GUJ)

SANJAYKUMAR SHIVKUMAR MALKANI v. STATE OF GUJARAT

SCR.A/10394/2019 · 2025-09-01

J C Doshi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD R/SPECIAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION (QUASHING) NO. 10394 of 2019 ========================================================== SANJAYKUMAR SHIVKUMAR MALKANI Versus STATE OF GUJARAT & ANR. ========================================================== Appearance: MR KRITENDRA TIWARI(9924) for the Applicant(s) No. 1 MR RAJA RAM BAJPAI(7188) for the Applicant(s) No. 1 MR. AAMIR S PATHAN(7142) for the Respondent(s) No. 2 MR. CHINTAN DAVE ADDL. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR for the Respondent(s) No. 1 ========================================================== CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE J. C. DOSHI Date : 01/09/2025 ORAL ORDER When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned advocate for the petitioner is absent. 2. In this petition, the petitioner challenges the order passed in Criminal Revision Application No. 39 of 2019 passed by 3rd Additional Sessions Judge, Deesa, whereby learned Sessions Judge has confirmed the order passed below Exh. 14 in Criminal Case No. 3211 of 2018 by Judicial Magistrate First Class, Deesa. 3. The application at Exh. 14 was more under Section 143 A of the Negotiable Instruments Act to get the interim compensation,came to be dismissed by the learned Trial Court and confirmed by the learned Judge. 4. Looking to the facts and circumstances of the case, the p. 1 cause for filing the present application does not survive. 5. In view of above, the petition stands dismissed for non- prosecution. (J. C. DOSHI,J) MARY VADAKKAN p. 2 Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judge. Digitally signed by: MARY VINOD ANTHANATTE(HC00204), Principal Pvt. Secretary, at High Court of Gujarat on 01/09/2025 14:59:35