Balusupati Chinna Galaiah v. The State of Andhra Pradesh
WP/2737/2018 · 2025-07-03
Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 6621 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 6621 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010062702018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] FRIDAY,THE FOURTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 2737/2018 Between:
1. BALUSUPATI CHINNA GALAIAH, S/O. B.DEVADOSS AGE. 53 YEARS, OCC. RECORD ASSISTANT O/O. A.B.M. HIGH SCHOOL, MARKAPURAM PRAKASHAM DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF SCHOOL EDUCATION, VELGAPUDI, AMRAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH
2. THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT
3. THE REGIONAL JOINT DIRECTOR OF SCHOOL EDUCATION, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order, writ or direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of Respondent No.3 in not granting promotion to the petitioner as Junior Assistant in A.B.M. High School (Aided), Markapuram, Prakasham District, is bad, illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and violating the principles of Natural Justice and also the provisions of Rule 6(2) of A.P. Ministerial Service Rules 1998 and G.O.Ms.No.261, GA(SER.B) Department, dated 14-07-1998 and Memo No. 4639/Ser.B/A2/05-1, dated 11-01-2005 and consequently direct the Respondent No.3 grant promotion approval to the petitioner and pass
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. Y SURESH KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR SCHOOL EDUCATION (AP)
2
The Court made the following:
ORDER:
The instant Writ Petition is filed by the Petitioner seeking indulgence of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief:
“ .... to issue an order, writ or direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of Respondent No.3 in not granting promotion to the petitioner as Junior Assistant in A.B.M. High School (Aided), Markapuram, Prakasham District, is bad, illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and violating the principles of Natural Justice and also the provisions of Rule 6(2) of A.P. Ministerial Service Rules 1998 and G.O.Ms.No.261, GA(SER.B) Department, dated 14-07-1998 and Memo No. 4639/Ser.B/A2/05-1, dated 11-01-2005 and consequently direct the Respondent No.3 grant promotion approval to the petitioner and pass ...”
2. When the matter is called, none represented for the Petitioner.
3. Despite the matter being listed under the caption “For dismissal”, none represented for the Petitioner today.
4. In that view, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No
order as to costs. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed.
DR.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Mjl/*
3
HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
Writ Petition No. 2737 of 2018
04.07.2025
Mjl /*