Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 6620 (JHR)

RAVINDAR SHARAN ALIAS RAVINDRA SHARAN@ RAVINDAR SARAN v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./1341/2025 · 2025-02-27

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No.1341 of 2025 ------ Ravindar Sharan @ Ravindra Sharan @ Ravindar Saran, aged 52 years, son of Late Raghav Sharan, resident of Main Road, Ramgarh, P.O. and P.S. Ramgarh, Dist.-Ramgarh .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Ms. Priyanka Agrawal, Advocate For the State : Ms. Bandana Sinha, Addl. P.P. ------ Order No.02 Dated- 27-02-2025 Heard the parties. Apprehending his arrest in connection with Mahila P.S. Case No.17 of 2024 arising out of Complaint Case No. 927 of 2024 which has been sent under Section 175(3) of the B.N.S, 2023 and instituted under Sections 74, 75, 76 65, 62, 352, 351(1), 351(2) and 351(3) of B.N.S, the petitioner has moved this Court for grant of privileges of anticipatory bail. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that petitioner outraged the modesty of the informant. It is next submitted that there is admitted land dispute between the parties. It is further submitted that petitioner and the informant are residing at the same premises. It is then submitted that proceeding under Section 126 of B.N.S.S, 2023 is pending between the parties for the self- same occurrence. It is further submitted that there is inordinate and unexplained delay of lodging of the complaint which upon being referred to police, the F.I.R. of the case has been registered. It is also submitted that the petitioner undertakes that he will not annoy or disturb the informant in any manner during the pendency of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner undertakes to cooperate with the investigation of the case and also undertakes to furnish sufficient security including cash security hence, the petitioner be given the privilege of anticipatory bail. Learned Addl.P.P appearing for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner. Considering the submissions of learned counsels and the facts and circumstances stated above, I am inclined to grant privileges of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to surrender in the Court below within six weeks from today and in the event of his arrest or surrendering, he will be enlarged on bail on depositing Rs.20,000/- as cash security and on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ramgarh in connection with Mahila P.S. Case No.17 of 2024 arising out of Complaint Case No. 927 of 2024 with the condition that he will co-operate with the investigation of the case and appear before the investigating officer as and when noticed by him and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the pendency of the case and petitioner undertakes that he will not annoy or disturb the informant in any manner during the pendency of the case and further conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Rohit/