AMIT LOHAR @ SUNDRU v. THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ANR.
CRM(DB)/714/2024 · 2025-01-31
Gaurang Kanth, Joymalya Bagchi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 66192 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 66192 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
03.01.2025
SK/ct 1
In the High Court at Calcutta Circuit Bench at Jalpaiguri sl no. 48
CRM(DB)/714/2024
In Re: An Application for Bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973/Under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Banarhat Police Station Case No.114 of 2023 Dated 10.05.2023 under Section 6 of the POCSO Act
2012.
In Re : AMIT LOHAR @ SUNDRU…… petitioner
Mr. Anirban Banerjee,
Ms. R. Chakraborty,
...for the defacto complainant.
Mr. Sourav Ganguly,
Mr. D.Shil, ...for the state
None appears on behalf of the petitioner nor is any adjournment prayed for even in the second call. The matter has been repeatedly adjourned on 23 December, 2024 and 19 December, 2024. It is obvious that the petitioner is neither interested nor serious in proceeding with this application and has sought for an adjournment with ulterior intent to forum shop. In view of the repeated non-appearance of the petitioner, CRM(DB)/714/2024 stands dismissed for default. The defacto complainant is represented.
(RAVI KRISHAN KAPUR, J.)
(UDAY KUMAR, J.)