IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT Jeetu Ram State of Haryana CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI Present : Mr. Mr. Vikram Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner Mr. DEEPAK SIBAL Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that at this stage, he would be satisfied if the present Deputy Commissioner, decision on the of the petitioner. 2. Learned State counsel, who appears on advance notice, has no objection if the above prayer is accepted. 3. Accordingly, at this stage, witho case, the present take a decision on the behalf of the petitioner opportunity of hearing to all concerned, preferably within date of receipt of a copy of this order. 4. Needless to add that the decision so taken be petitioner and if the decision is not to the satisfaction of the petitioner, be at liberty to challenge the same, in accordance with law. May 28, 2025 vandana Whether speaking/reasoned : Whether reportable : Sr. No.149 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-16096- Date of Decision : Versus Haryana and others HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI Mr. Divyam Singh, Advocate for Mr. Vikram Singh, Advocate, or the petitioners. Mr. P.P.Chahar, Senior DAG, Haryana. *** DEEPAK SIBAL, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that at this stage, he be satisfied if the present petition is disposed of with a direction to Deputy Commissioner, Panipat District Panipat decision on the representation dated 01.04.2025 (Annexure P of the petitioner. Learned State counsel, who appears on advance notice, has no objection if the above prayer is accepted. Accordingly, at this stage, without commenting on case, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No. take a decision on the representation dated 01.04.2025 behalf of the petitioner, by passing a speaking order and after affording opportunity of hearing to all concerned, preferably within date of receipt of a copy of this order. Needless to add that the decision so taken be f the decision is not to the satisfaction of the petitioner, be at liberty to challenge the same, in accordance with law. (DEEPAK SIBAL JUDGE (LAPITA BANERJI) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT -2025 (O&M) Date of Decision : 28.05.2025 …Petitioner …Respondents DEEPAK SIBAL HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI Haryana. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that at this stage, he petition is disposed of with a direction to the Panipat-respondent No.2 to take a (Annexure P-4), made on behalf Learned State counsel, who appears on advance notice, has no ut commenting on the merits of the petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2 to .2025 (Annexure P-4), made on , by passing a speaking order and after affording opportunity of hearing to all concerned, preferably within two months from the Needless to add that the decision so taken be communicated to the f the decision is not to the satisfaction of the petitioner, he would be at liberty to challenge the same, in accordance with law. DEEPAK SIBAL) JUDGE (LAPITA BANERJI) JUDGE VANDANA 2025.05.29 18:26 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document