Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 66157 (ALL)

SMT. SARITA SHARMA AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

NA529/1913/2025 · 2025-07-06

Nalin Kumar Srivastava

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:105611 Court No. - 83 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 529 BNSS No. - 1913 of 2025 Applicant :- Smt. Sarita Sharma And Another Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Umesh Chandra Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Nalin Kumar Srivastava,J. 1. This application under Section 529 Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita (hereinafter referred to as B.N.S.S.) has been filed with a prayer to direct the learned trial court to decide Case No. 503 of 2021 (Sharita Sharma and another Vs. Krishnakant Sharma), under Section 125 Cr.P.C., Police Station Refinery, District Mathura, pending in the court of Additional Principal Judge, Family Court, Mathura, expeditiously within a stipulated period. 2. Heard learned counsel for the applicants as well as learned A.G.A. for the State. 3. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the applicants that the applicants before this Court are aggrieved wife and her minor daughter and matter is pending since the year 2021. It is further submitted that an application under Section 125 Cr.P.C. for maintenance allowance was filed by the applicants but no order has been passed by the trial court on the said application so far. 4. Learned AGA opposed the prayer. 5. I have considered the submissions and perused the record. 6. In the facts and circumstances of the case, the learned trial court is directed to decide the application under Section 125 Cr.P.C. filed by the applicants for interim maintenance allowance as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of two months from the date of production of certified copy of this order before it, and to make all endeavours for expeditious disposal of the aforesaid case without granting unnecessary adjournment to either of the parties and keeping in view the heavy workload in the said court, if there is no legal impediment. 7. It is also made clear that the Court/Presiding Officer is not the only stake holder in the trial and disposal of a case, hence, besides the P.O. concerned, all the stake holders i.e. police and execution authorities, advocates, parties to the case, staff are also made bound by this order and it will be their responsibility also to assist the Court in every manner for the expeditious disposal of this case. 8. With the above observations, the application stands disposed of. Order Date :- 7.7.2025 Rmk. Digitally signed by :- RAM MURTI KUSHWAHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- RAM MURTI KUSHWAHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad