Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 66154 (PNJ)

VEENA v. THE STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS

CWP/16612/2025 · 2025-05-29

Vinod S Bhardwaj

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT 143 VEENA THE STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS CORAM: HON'BL Present: Mr. Mr. Satpal Nain, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Rahul Dev, Addl. A.G. Haryana. VINOD S. BHARDWAJ, J. (ORAL) The present writ petition has been filed seeking directions to the respondents to policy/notification dated 29.07.2011 (Annexure P direct the respondents to grant salary effect from the aforesaid policy with all consequential benefits including seniority and arrears alongwith interest @ 12% per annum. After arguing at some length, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that with regard to h Notice dated 17.04.2025 (Annexure P action thereup this stage, in case responden IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD S. BHARDWAJ **** Mr. Dalel Singh Nain, Advocate Mr. Satpal Nain, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Rahul Dev, Addl. A.G. Haryana. **** VINOD S. BHARDWAJ, J. (ORAL) The present writ petition has been filed seeking directions to the respondents to regularize the service of the petitioner in terms of policy/notification dated 29.07.2011 (Annexure P direct the respondents to grant salary to the petitioner effect from the aforesaid policy with all consequential benefits including seniority and arrears alongwith interest @ 12% per annum. After arguing at some length, learned counsel for the petitioner at with regard to his grievance, the petitioner has dated 17.04.2025 (Annexure P-3) but the respondents have thereupon till date. He contends that the petitioner would be this stage, in case respondent No.3-the Treasury Officer, Hisar IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH CWP-16612-2025 Date of Decision: 29.05.2025 ... Petitioner STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS ... Respondents E MR. JUSTICE VINOD S. BHARDWAJ Advocate and Mr. Rahul Dev, Addl. A.G. Haryana. The present writ petition has been filed seeking directions to the regularize the service of the petitioner in terms of policy/notification dated 29.07.2011 (Annexure P-2) and a further prayer to the petitioner in regular pay scale with effect from the aforesaid policy with all consequential benefits including seniority and arrears alongwith interest @ 12% per annum. After arguing at some length, learned counsel for the petitioner grievance, the petitioner has served a Legal but the respondents have not taken any He contends that the petitioner would be satisfied at the Treasury Officer, Hisar is directed to IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT 2025 .05.2025 ... Petitioner ... Respondents The present writ petition has been filed seeking directions to the regularize the service of the petitioner in terms of to in regular pay scale with effect from the aforesaid policy with all consequential benefits including After arguing at some length, learned counsel for the petitioner Legal taken any satisfied at is directed to VISHAL SHARMA 2025.05.29 16:44 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-16612- consider and decide the by the petitioner, by passing a speaking order in a time bound manner. Notice of motion. Mr. the respondent response, if necessary. request. Accordingly, the parties and without commenting anything on the merits of the case, directing respondent No. 17.04.2025 (Annexure P period of four Needless to mention that representation petitioner, the same shall be disbursed in two months. MAY 29, 2025. Vishal Sharma -2025 consider and decide the Legal Notice dated 17.04.2025 (Annexure P by the petitioner, by passing a speaking order in a time bound manner. Notice of motion. Mr. Rahul Dev, Addl. A.G. Haryana respondents and prays for some time to complete instructions and file response, if necessary. He, however, does not have any Accordingly, the present petition is disposed of the parties and without commenting anything on the merits of the case, directing respondent No.3 to consider and decide the 17.04.2025 (Annexure P-3) by passing a reasoned and speaking order within a four months of the receipt of certified copy of this order. Needless to mention that if representation, in case any monetary benefit petitioner, the same shall be disbursed in her , 2025. Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable -2- Legal Notice dated 17.04.2025 (Annexure P-3) served by the petitioner, by passing a speaking order in a time bound manner. Rahul Dev, Addl. A.G. Haryana accepts notice on behalf of for some time to complete instructions and file does not have any objection to the above the present petition is disposed of with the consent the parties and without commenting anything on the merits of the case, to consider and decide the Legal Notice dated by passing a reasoned and speaking order within a eceipt of certified copy of this order. if upon considering the said monetary benefit is found due and payable to the her favour within a further period of (VINOD S. BHARDWAJ) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No : Yes/No 3) served accepts notice on behalf of for some time to complete instructions and file above of the parties and without commenting anything on the merits of the case, by Legal Notice dated by passing a reasoned and speaking order within a upon considering the said is found due and payable to the favour within a further period of VINOD S. BHARDWAJ) VISHAL SHARMA 2025.05.29 16:44 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document