MOHINIRAJ KANTRAO PATHAK v. SHRI EKNATH PAJARAM DAWALE THE SECRETARY
CP/572/2023 · 2025-12-10
Shri N B Suryawanshi, Vaishali Patil Jadhav
Contempt Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 66154 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 66154 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
{1} 916-CP-572-2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CONT. PETITION NO. 572 OF 2023 IN WP/4395/2023 Mohiniraj Kantrao Pathak ….Petitioner VERSUS Shri Eknath Pajaram Dawale The Secretary & Others …..Respondents ….. Mr. I.D. Maniyar, Advocate for the Petitioner Mr. A.R. Tapse h/f Mr. P.D. Suryawanshi, Advocate for respondents No. 3 to 5 .......
CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI AND VAISHALI PATIL JADHAV, JJ.
DATE : 10th DECEMBER, 2025
ORDER :
1. Learned advocate for the Zilla Parishad has placed on record copy of order passed by Chief Executive Officer thereby sanctioning the amount of Rs. 10,84,911/- towards retiral dues and 6% interest of the petitioner. Same is taken on record and marked ‘X’ for identification purposes.
2. On instructions, learned advocate for Zilla Parisahd states that, within eight weeks said amount will be disbursed to the petitioner. Bhagyawant Punde 2025:BHC-AUG:34783-DB
{2} 916-CP-572-2023
3. By recording said statement as undertaking to this Court, contempt petition is disposed of.
4. We make it clear that, if the amount is not paid within aforesaid time stipulation, same will be treated as aggravated form of contempt.
(VAISHALI PATIL JADHAV, J.) (NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J.)
Bhagyawant Punde