IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.54779 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-390 Year-2024 Thana- MAJORGANJ District- Sitamarhi ====================================================== Tamish Kumar S/O Sanjiv Purve R/O Vill.- Bhaluaha, P.S.- Sonbarsa, Dist.- Sitamarhi. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Ms. Madhubala Verma For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Umesh Lal Verma ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 2 03-09-2025 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Majorganj P.S. Case No.390/2024, registered for the offences punishable under Section 317(5) of the B.N.S.S. & Sections 8, 20(b)(ii)(c) of the N.D.P.S. Act. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and 52 kilograms of Ganja is alleged to have been recovered from a car and Lakhindra was apprehended and he disclosed the name of the petitioner stating that petitioner and others worked as route liner. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant at the instance of Lakhindra. It is also submitted that Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.54779 of 2025(2) dt.03-09-2025 2/2 confession in police custody does not have any evidentiary value. 5. Learned A.P.P. opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner and submits that allegation is of recovery of 52 kilograms of Ganja which is a commercial quantity. It is also submitted that investigation in the case is continuing and if privilege of anticipatory bail is granted to the petitioner, the petitioner may abscond. 6. Considering the submissions made by the learned APP, the Court is not inclined to extend the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 7. The anticipatory bail application of the petitioner is rejected. amit/- (Satyavrat Verma, J) U T