IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 145 SANJEEV KUMAR AND ANOTHER STATE OF PUNJAB CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. Present : Mr Ms. Himani Arora, A.A.G, Punjab MANISHA BATRA 1. The present petition has been filed under Article 226 Constitution of India seeking official respondents at the hands of respondent dated 26.05.2025 (Annexure P 2. At the ve submitted that the petitioner 26.05.2025 before the Officer, S.B.S. Nagar ( the present petition but the same has not yet been considered and no action has been taken thereon. would be satisfied if appropriate directions are issued to IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP No. Date of decision: SANJEEV KUMAR AND ANOTHER Versus STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA Mr. Kulbir Singh Saini, Advocate for the Ms. Himani Arora, A.A.G, Punjab **** MANISHA BATRA, J. (oral) The present petition has been filed under Article 226 Constitution of India seeking issuance of a writ of mandamus directing official respondents No.2 and 3 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioner at the hands of respondents No. 4 & 5 and to take action on dated 26.05.2025 (Annexure P-5). At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioners have recently filed a representation on before the Senior Superintendent Officer, S.B.S. Nagar (Annexure P-5) raising their petition but the same has not yet been considered and no action has been taken thereon. He further submitted that at this stage, the satisfied if appropriate directions are issued to IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH No.5681 of 2025 Date of decision: 28.05.2025 …. Petitioners Versus …. Respondents MANISHA BATRA , Advocate for the petitioners. Ms. Himani Arora, A.A.G, Punjab. The present petition has been filed under Article 226 of the issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners take action on their representation ry outset, learned counsel for the petitioners has recently filed a representation on Superintendent of Police and Station House their grievances as mentioned in petition but the same has not yet been considered and no action has further submitted that at this stage, the petitioners satisfied if appropriate directions are issued to respondent No. 2- of the the s their representation has recently filed a representation on of Police and Station House in petition but the same has not yet been considered and no action has s - Jyoti 2025.05.29 08:58 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Senior Superintendent representation filed by the petitioner 3. Notice of motion. 4. Ms. Himani Arora, A.A.G, Punjab accepted the n needful will be done in due course. Let a complete set of the supplied to her 5. In view of the limited prayer made by the petitioner commenting anything on the merits of the case, the present petition is of at this stage with a direction to respondent No. 2 to decide representation period of 15 days law. Needless to say, if any threat is found to the respondents would provide and liberty. 28.05.2025 Jyoti-IV CRWP No.5681 of 2025 Superintendent of Police, S.B.S. Nagar representation filed by the petitioners and take necessary action thereon. Notice of motion. Ms. Himani Arora, A.A.G, Punjab otice on behalf of the respondent needful will be done in due course. Let a complete set of the during the course of the day. In view of the limited prayer made by the petitioner nting anything on the merits of the case, the present petition is of at this stage with a direction to respondent No. 2 to decide dated 26.05.2025 (Annexure P 15 days from today, by passing a speaking order in law. Needless to say, if any threat is found to the respondents would provide them adequate security in order to protect their life (MANISHA BATRA) Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No. Whether reportable : Yes/No CRWP No.5681 of 2025 -2- of Police, S.B.S. Nagar to decide the aforesaid necessary action thereon. Ms. Himani Arora, A.A.G, Punjab, who is present in Court, has otice on behalf of the respondents-State and submits that the needful will be done in due course. Let a complete set of the paperbook be In view of the limited prayer made by the petitioners, without nting anything on the merits of the case, the present petition is disposed of at this stage with a direction to respondent No. 2 to decide the aforesaid Annexure P-5) of the petitioners within a from today, by passing a speaking order in accordance with law. Needless to say, if any threat is found to the petitioners, the official them adequate security in order to protect their life (MANISHA BATRA) JUDGE Yes/No. Yes/No decide the aforesaid who is present in Court, has the paperbook be , without disposed the aforesaid within a accordance with , the official them adequate security in order to protect their life Jyoti 2025.05.29 08:58 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document