HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL First Bail Application No. 844 of 2025 Suleman Ansari ….....Applicant Versus State of Uttarakhand ….….Respondent Present:- Mr. Vikas Anand, Advocate for the applicant. Ms. Manisha Rana Singh, D.A.G. for the State. Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. (Oral) Applicant is in judicial custody in Sessions Trial No.140 of 2024, State Vs. Karamjeet Sandhu and Others, arising out of FIR No. 322 of 2024, under Sections 307, 504, 120-B, and 34 IPC and Section 3/25 of the Arms Act, 1959, Police Station Rudrapur, District Udham Singh Nagar. He has sought his release on bail. 2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant would submit that co-accused, having similar role, has already been granted bail. 4. Learned State Counsel admits these facts. 2 5. Having considered, this Court is of the view that it is a case fit for bail and the applicant deserves to be enlarged on bail. 6. The bail application is allowed. 7. Let the applicant be released on bail, on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two reliable sureties, each in the like amount, to the satisfaction of the court concerned. (Ravindra Maithani, J) 02.06.2025 Ravi Bisht