SURABHI VENKATESWARLU v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
WP/3401/2025 · 2025-02-12
Gannamaneni Ramakrishna Prasad
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 6615 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 6615 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO: 3401 OF 2025 Between: Surabhi Venkateswarlu, S/o Chinna Pitchaiah, aged about 52 years, R/o Jalalapalem, Brahmanapalli, Vinukonda Mandal, Palnadu District. ...Petitioner AND
1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, A P Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District. 2. The District Collector, Palnadu District, at Narasaraopet. 3. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Narasaraopet, Palnadu District. 4. The Tahsildar, Vinukonda Mandal, Vinukonda, Palnadu District. 5. Sri Gudipati Ravi, S/o Venkaiah, R/o Jalalapalem, Brahmanapalli, Vinukonda Mandal,Palnadu District. 6. Sri Galam Govindaraju, S/o Bakkaiah, R/o Julalapalem Village, Vinukonda Mandal Palnadu District. ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying th^ in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may
be pleased to issue any writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the 4'*^ respondent in mutating the names of the respondent in the revenue record in respect of the land admeasuring in Sy.No.90 an extent of Ac.0.72 cents (part of Ac.8.61 cents) situated in Brahmanapalli Village, Vinukonda Mandal, Palnadu District, though he purchased the land in Sy.No.91-1A and 91-IB admeasuring Ac.0.34 cents and Ac.0.26 cents respectively (total Ac.0.60 cents) in the same Village without following the procedure contemplated under Andhra Pradesh Rights in Land and Pattadar Pass Book Act, 1971 and the Rules framed their under as illegal, arbitrary, contrary to law, violation of principles of natural justice and violative of Articles 14 and 300- A of Constitution of India and consequently direct the 4TH respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 1.7.2024 made for deletion of the name of the 5TH respondent in respect of the land in Sy.No.90 an extent of Ac.0.72 cents (part of Ac.8.61 cents) situated in Brahmanapalli Village.
lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 of CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 4‘^ respondent not to effect further mutations in respect of the land in Sy.No.90 an extent of Ac.0.72 cents (part of Ac.8.61 cents) situated in Brahmanapalli Village, Vinukonda Mandal, Palandu District by considering the petitioner’s representation dated 01.07.2024, pending disposal of the writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI KOCHIRI RAJA SHEKAR Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 4: GP FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondent Nos.5 & 6: NONE APPEARED The Court made the following:
1 APHC010061832025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3328] WEDNESDAY ,THE TWELFTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO: 3401/2025 Between: AGED BRAHMANAPALLI, 1.SURABHI VENKATESWARLU, S/0 CHINNA PITCHAIAH, ABOUT 52 YEARS, R/0 JALALAPALEM, VINUKONDA MANUAL,PALNADU DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1.THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL REVENUE DEPARTMENT, A P SECRETARIAT, SECRETARY, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2.THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, PALNADU DISTRICT, AT NARASARAOPET. 3.THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, NARASARAOPET, PALNADU DISTRICT. 4.THE TAHSILDAR, VINUKONDA MANUAL, VINUKONDA, PALNADU DISTRICT. R/0 JALALAPALEM, 5.SRI GUDIPATI RAVI, S/0 VENKAIAH, BRAHMANAPALLI, VINUKONDA MANDAL,PALNADU DISTRICT. 6.SRI GALAM GOVINDARAJU, S/0 BAKKAIAH, R/0 JULALAPALEM VILLAGE, VINUKONDA MANUAL PALNADU DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner:
2 1.K0CHIRI RAJASHEKAR Counsel for the Respondent{S):
1.GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following;
ORAL ORDER: Heard Sri Kochiri Raja Shekar, learned Counsel for the Writ Petitioner and Sri K. Arjun Chowdhary, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for the Respondent Nos.1 to 4. 2. The present Writ Petition is filed challenging the action of the Respondent No.4 in mutating the names of the Unofficial Respondent Nos.5 & 6 in the Revenue Record of various extents. Sri K. Arjun Chowdhary, Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue has submitted the Written Instruction furnished by the Tahsildar of Vinukonda Mandal dated 06.02.2025 along with the correspondence between the Tahsildar and the District Collector dated 04.02.2025, the Representation submitted by Respondent No.5 dated 04.11.2024, the Sale Deed of Respondent No.5 and the Revenue Record etc. Copies of it are served on the Counsel for the Writ Petitioner as well and the same are taken on record.
It is stated in the Written Instructions that the Representation submitted by the Writ Petitioner dated 01.07.2024 is under active consideration by the Tahsildar (Respondent No.4). 3. 4. Having regard to the above facts, this Court deems it appropriate to dispose of this Writ Petition, at the admission stage, without going into the merit, directing the Tahsildar, Vinukonda Mandal (Respondent No.4) to consider the Representation of the Writ Petitioner dated 01.07.2024 (Ex.P.8) and pass a Speaking Order in accordance with law within a period of eight (8) weeks from today and furnish a copy of such Order to all the interested parties
5. Needless to state that the Respondent No.4 is statutorily obligated to adhere to the principles of Natural Justice by issuing advance Notice to all the including the Writ Petitioner and the Unofficial Respondent consider their submissions/objections and documents, if interested parties, Nos.5 & 6 herein, any, before passing the final order. of this Order to Respondent Writ Petitioner is directed to submit a copy No.4 within one week from today, for immediate compliance. 6. With these observations and directions, this Writ Petition stands
disposed of. No order as to costs.
7. Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand closed in terms of this order.
8.
Sd/-SHA1K MOHD RAFl assistant registrar //TRUE COPY// section'OFFICER Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, A P Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District.
2. The District Collector, Palnadu District, at Narasaraopet.
3. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Narasaraopet, Palnadu District.
4. The Tahsildar, Vinukonda Mandal, Vinukonda, Palnadu District.
5. Sri Gudipati Ravi, S/o Venkaiah, R/o Jalalapalem, Brahmanapalli, Vinukonda Mandal, Palnadu District. Galam Govindaraju, S/o Bakkaiah, R/o Julalapalem Village, Vinukonda Mandal Palnadu District.
7. One CC to Sri Kochiri Raja Shekar Advocate [OPUC] Two CCs to GP for Revenue, High Court Of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT]
9. Three CD Copies To,
1. The
6. Sri
8. sree
HIGH COURT DATED:12/02/2025
ORDER WP.No.3401 of 2025 5 ^ 2 FEB 2025 SB ■Jc Current Section .
DISPOSING OF THE W.P.
WITHOUT COSTS