164 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-30476-2025 Date of Decision:28.05.2025 Sumit Sehgal …Petitioner vs. State of Haryana and others …Respondents Coram : Hon’ble Mr. Justice N.S.Shekhawat Present : Ms. Radhika, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Rajinder Kumar Banku, Deputy Advocate General, Haryana. *** N.S.Shekhawat J. (Oral) 1. The petitioner has filed the second petition under Section 528 of B.N.S.S with a prayer to direct the respondents No.2 and 3 to arrest the respondent No.4 in a case arising out of FIR No.72, dated 06.03.2024, under Sections 120-B,406,420 of IPC, Police Station Gohana City, District Sonipat (Annexure P-1). 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has already submitted a representation dated 21.05.2025 (Annexure P-3) to the Commissioner of Police, Sonipat, District Sonipat-respondent No.2 and she shall be satisfied at this stage, if directions are issued to respondent No.2 to look into the representation dated 21.05.2025 (Annexure P-3) and take appropriate steps, in accordance with law. 3. In view of the prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner HITESH 2025.05.29 08:56 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document/judgment High Court, Chandigarh CRM-M-30476-2025 -2 and without expressing anything on the merits of the case, the present petition is allowed with a direction to respondent No.2- Commissioner of Police, Sonipat, District Sonipat to look into representation dated 21.05.2025 (Annexure P-3) and take appropriate action within two weeks, in accordance with law. 4. Disposed off. (N.S.SHEKHAWAT) 28.05.2025 JUDGE hitesh Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No HITESH 2025.05.29 08:56 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document/judgment High Court, Chandigarh