SAMEER GUPTA v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND THROUGH SECRETARY (HOME) U.K. GOVT. DEHRADUN
WPCRL/606/2023 · 2025-03-26
Pankaj Purohit
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 6614 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 6614 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2025:UHC:2207 SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s
order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS
WPCRL No.606 of 2023 Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J.
Ms. Soniya Chawla,
learned counsel for petitioner.
2. Mr. Bhaskar Chandra Joshi, learned A.G.A. with Mr. Vipul Painuli and Ms. Sweta Dobhal, learned Brief Holders for the State of Uttarakhand/ respondent Nos.1 to 3.
3. Mr. Aakib Ahmed,
learned counsel for respondent No.4.
4. By means of the present criminal writ petition, petitioner has challenged the FIR No.253 of 2023 dated 19.04.2023 registered with P.S. Kotwali Haridwar, District Haridwar, under Sections 120-B, 147, 153-A, 420, 447, 504 and 506 IPC.
5. It is contended by the learned State Counsel that after investigation, final report has already been submitted by the police on 18.10.2024 against the petitioner, therefore, nothing remains to be decided in this writ petition and it becomes infructuous.
6. The said fact is not disputed by learned counsel for the petitioner.
7. In view of the statement made by learned State Counsel, the present criminal writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
8. Interim
order dated 16.05.2023 stands vacated.
(Pankaj Purohit, J.)
26.03.2025 PN