Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 66134 (CAL)

SK. ADUL HAMID @ ABDUL HAMID @ COTTU @ CHHOTTU AND ANR. v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL

CRM(M)/96/2025 · 2025-05-07

Tirthankar Ghosh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

10.04.2026 Serial no. 422 [G.S.D] CRM (M) 96 of 2025 With CRAN 1 of 2025 In the matter of : Sk. Abdul Hamid @ Abdul Hamid @ Chottu @ Chhottu &Anr. … Petitioner(s) Mr. Ansuman Chakraborty Mr. Rajib Kumar Acharyya Mr. S. S. Saha … for the Petitioner(s) Mr. Debarshi Brahma … for the State-respondent(s) Mr. Soumya Nag … for the defacto-complainant(s) Learned advocate for the petitioner prays for waiver of the conditions which was imposed by granting bail on 07.05.2025. Learned advocate for the defacto-complainant is present. Learned advocate for the State has submitted a report which reflects that the evidence of the charge-sheet witness nos. 1, 3 and 4 has been completed and dates were fixed for examination of CSW Nos. 5 and 6 on or about in the month of March, 2026. The charge-sheet reflects that nine of the witnesses are individual persons not associated with any government department. In view of such witnesses being left to be examined, I direct the learned trial court to waive the conditions after the evidence of the said nine witnesses is over. If time is stretched to more than a year, then in that case, after a year, the conditions so imposed will automatically be deemed to be waived. 2 With the aforesaid observations, CRAN 1 of 2025 is disposed of. Report so submitted be kept with the record. Parties to act on a server copy of this order duly collected from the official website of the Hon’ble High Court, Calcutta. (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)