BANK OF MAHARASHTRA, TO BE REPRESENTED THR ITS AUTHORISED REPRESENTATIVE MR. ROHIT RAMAN v. UNION OF INDIA, SERVICE THROUGH THE SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF LABOUR AND EMPLOYMENT
C.M.P./231/2025 · 2025-08-29
Anil Kumar Choudhary
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 6613 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 6613 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[ 2025:JHHC:26221] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
C. M. P. No.231 of 2025
------ Bank of Maharashtra, a nationalized bank, to be represented through its authorized representative Mr. Rohit Raman, age about 40 years, having its Head Office at 1501, “LOKMANGAL”, Shivaji Nagar, Pune 411005 and also carrying on business at its Dhanbad branch at Radha Swamy Arcade Main Road, P.O. & P.S.-Saraidhela, Dist.-Dhanbad- 898127
.... .... …. Petitioner
Versus
1. Union of India, service through the Secretary, Ministry of Labour and Employment, Shrama Shakti Bhawan, 5 Roti Marg, P.O. & P.S.- Sansad Marg Dist:-New Delhi-110001
2. Salil Kumar Das, S/o Late Parmanand Das, residing at LIG 189, Housing Colony, P.O. & P.S. Barai, Dist.-Bhagalpur, Bihar, PIN- 812003
.... .... .... Opposite Parties
------
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioner : Mr. Rahul Anand, Advocate
For the O.P.s
: Mr. Anil Kumar, Addl. SGI
Ms. Shabana Parveen, Advocate
Mr. D. K. Malityar, Advocate
------
Order No.04 Dated- 29-08-2025
Heard the parties.
This Civil Miscellaneous Petition has been filed by the petitioner with a prayer for restoration of W.P.(L) No.2430 of 2013 to its original file which stood dismissed on 05.09.2023 due to the non-appearance of the petitioner’s counsel.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the W.P.(L) No.2430 of 2013 stood dismissed due to non-appearance of the petitioner’s counsel. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the non- appearance of their advocate on 05.09.2023 was neither willful nor deliberate. It is next submitted that the dismissal of the said W.P(L) No.2430 of 2013 for non-appearance of Advocate on 05.09.2023 was neither deliberate nor intentional. It is also submitted that the petitioner has very good grounds to agitate in the said W.P(L) No.2430 of 2013 and unless the same is restored to its original file, the petitioner will be highly
prejudiced. Hence, it is submitted that the W.P(L) No.2430 of 2013 be restored to its original file.
Learned counsel for the opposite parties have not raised any serious objection.
Considering the aforesaid submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner, W.P(L) No.2430 of 2013 is directed to be restored to its original file at the same at which it was before its dismissal.
Registry is directed to list W.P(L) No.2430 of 2013 before the concerned Bench after two weeks.
This Civil Miscellaneous Petition is disposed of accordingly.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Rohit/