Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 6613 (AP)

Singasani Veera Reddy, v. State of Andhra Pradesh,

WP/3595/2025 · 2025-03-06

Nyapathy Vijay

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

THURSDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION NO: 3595/2025 Between: Singasani Veera Reddy, ...PETITIONER AND State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. ANNAMNEEDI BALAKRISHNA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV AP 2. GP FOR FINANCE PLANNING APHC010062912025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3460] 2 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION No.3595 OF 2025 ORDER: The Writ Petition is filed questioning action of the respondents in not releasing the amount of Rs.52,19,008/- to the Petitioner even after finalizing the bills for the works executed under agreement Nos.184/2023-24 dated 19.08.2023 and 174/2023-2024, dated 04.12.2023 for an amount of Rs.35,02,626/- and Rs.17,16,382/- respectively. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the Petitioner and the learned counsel for the Respondents. 2. The Petitioner submits that he had completed the works under “Gadapa Gadapaki Mana Prabhuthvam Scheme (GGMP)” vide agreement Nos.184/2023-24 dated 19.08.2023 and 174/2023- 2024, dated 04.12.2023 for an amount of Rs.35,02,626/- and Rs.17,16,382/- respectively. 3. The learned Standing Counsel passed on the written instructions signed by the Superintendent Engineer, wherein it was mentioned that the work was completed in the time specified and that the amounts payable to the petitioner was also admitted. As the amounts are not available under the Head of Gadapa 3 Gadapaki Mana Prabhuthvam (GGMP) Scheme, the Respondent- Authorities could not make payment to the Petitioner. It was further mentioned that the amounts will be paid to the Petitioner on sanction of funds. 4. Instructions are placed on record. 5. Considering the fact that the execution of work and the amounts are admitted, the Respondent-Authorities are directed to pay amounts due, to the Petitioner within a period of four (04) months from today. 6. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, miscellaneous applications, if any, pending shall stand closed. _____________________ NYAPATHY VIJAY, J Date: 06.03.2025. PKR 4 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY 135 WRIT PETITION No.3595 OF 2025 Date: 06.03.2025. PKR