IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT M/s Neeraj Joshi State of Punjab and others CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI Present : Mr. Parambir Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. R.S.Pandher, Additional A.G., Punjab. Mr. Hoshiar Singh, Advocate for Mr. Sanjeev Sharma, Advocate, for respondents No.2 to 6. Mr. Sunil Chadha, Senior Advocate with Ms. Arashdeep Kaur, Advocate, for respo DEEPAK SIBAL Through this petition, the his technical bid by the respondent but since the tender in question was for execution of a work allotted for a period of one year from 01.04.2025 to 31.03.2026, the issue raised through this petition has been ren and is left open to be decided in an appropriate case. Disposed of. It is clarified that in the way of the petitioner to seek damages from the respondents, if so advised, before the civil Court. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. March 17, 2026 vandana Whether speaking/reasoned : Whether reportable : Sr. No.119+343 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CM-6940 and 11803 CWP-8630- Date of Decision : M/s Neeraj Joshi Versus State of Punjab and others …Respondent HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI Mr. Parambir Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. R.S.Pandher, Additional A.G., Punjab. Mr. Hoshiar Singh, Advocate for Mr. Sanjeev Sharma, Advocate, for respondents No.2 to 6. Mr. Sunil Chadha, Senior Advocate with Ms. Arashdeep Kaur, Advocate, for respondents No.7. *** DEEPAK SIBAL, J. (Oral) Through this petition, the petitioner had challenged the rejection of his technical bid by the respondent but since the tender in question was for execution of a work allotted for a period of one year from 01.04.2025 to he issue raised through this petition has been ren and is left open to be decided in an appropriate case. Disposed of. It is clarified that disposal of the petition shall not be an impediment in the way of the petitioner to seek damages from the respondents, if so advised, civil Court. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. (DEEPAK SIBAL JUDGE (LAPITA BANERJI) JUDGE March 17, 2026 Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT 6940 and 11803-CWP-2025 in/and -2025 (O&M) Date of Decision : 17.03.2026 …Petitioner …Respondents DEEPAK SIBAL HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI Mr. R.S.Pandher, Additional A.G., Punjab. Mr. Sunil Chadha, Senior Advocate with petitioner had challenged the rejection of his technical bid by the respondent but since the tender in question was for execution of a work allotted for a period of one year from 01.04.2025 to he issue raised through this petition has been rendered infructuous and is left open to be decided in an appropriate case. isposal of the petition shall not be an impediment in the way of the petitioner to seek damages from the respondents, if so advised, Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. DEEPAK SIBAL) JUDGE (LAPITA BANERJI) JUDGE VANDANA 2026.03.19 17:14 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document