Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 66113 (MAD)

E.PILLAYAR v. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR

WP/21899/2025 · 2025-06-20

C Kumarappan

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

W.P.No.21899 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 20.06.2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN W.P.No.21899 of 2025 E.Pillayar ... Petitioner Vs. 1. The District Collector, District Collectorate, Kanchipuram District, Kanchipuram. 2. The Project Director, District Rural Development Agency, District Collectorate, Kanchipuram District, Kanchipuram. 3. The Block Development Officer (Village Panchayats), Kanchipuram Panchayat Union, Siru Kaveripakkam, Kanchipuram District - 631 502. 4. Elumalai ... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, seeking for an issuance of writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondents 1 and 2 to conduct an enquiry on the petitioner's representation dated 10.032025 and further take appropriate disciplinary action against 4th respondent for his mala fide actions in the tender process. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.21899 of 2025 For Petitioner : Mr.G.Pugazhenthi For Respondents : Mr.Sasi Kumar Government Advocate for R1 & R2 : Mr.C.Sathish Government Advocate for R3 ORDER The writ petition has been instituted to direct the respondents 1 to 3 to consider the petitioner's representation dated 10.03.2025 and further direct the respondents to take disciplinary action against the fourth respondent for his malafide actions. 2. Learned Counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner has given complaint to the respondents 1 to 3 against the 4th respondent vide representation dated 10.03.2025, for the irregularities committed and the said representation is yet to be considered by the respondents 1 to 3. 3. At this juncture, learned Government Advocate for the respondents 1 to 3 would submit that the petitioner's representation would be considered within a reasonable time. 4. In such view of the submission of the learned Government https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.21899 of 2025 Advocate, without going into the merits of the matter, this Court deems it appropriate to direct the respondents 1 to 3 to consider the petitioner's representation dated 10.03.2025 and pass orders on it's own merits and in accordance with law, after giving notice to the 4th respondent, within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. In the result, the Writ Petition is disposed of with the above direction. No costs. 20.06.2025 veda Index:Yes/No Speaking order/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation:Yes/No https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.21899 of 2025 C.KUMARAPPAN, J. veda To 1. The District Collector, District Collectorate, Kanchipuram District, Kanchipuram. 2. The Project Director, District Rural Development Agency, District Collectorate, Kanchipuram District, Kanchipuram. 3. The Block Development Officer (Village Panchayats), Kanchipuram Panchayat Union, Siru Kaveripakkam, Kanchipuram District - 631 502. W.P.No.21899 of 2025 20.06.2025 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis