SAMIAH INTERNATIONAL BUILDERS LIMITED v. SUB DIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE
WPMS/1405/2025 · 2025-05-16
Manoj Kumar Tiwari
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 6609 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 6609 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2025:UHC:4020 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS
WPMS 1405/2025
Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.
Mr. B.D. Pande and Mr. Lalit Sharma, Counsel for the petitioner.
Mr. D.S. Bora, Standing Counsel, for the State.
(2) Petitioner has challenged order dated 30.4.2025, passed by Assistant Collector, 1st Class, Rudrapur in proceedings under Section 167 UPZA & LR Act, whereby part of the property purchased by the petitioner by a registered sale deed, executed in his favour in 2006, has been vested in the State for non-compliance with the conditions of permission granted.
(3) Learned State Counsel points out that petitioner has remedy of appeal under Section 331 of UPZA & LR Act and also that of revision under Section 330 of the said Act. This legal position is not disputed by learned Counsel for the petitioner.
(4) Accordingly, writ petition is dismissed on the ground of alternate remedy with liberty to petitioner to approach the appropriate forum. However, only for a period of one week, there shall be status quo qua the land in question.
(Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.) 16.5.2025 Pr PRABODH KUMAR Digitally signed by PRABODH KUMAR DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=3a082a00a95aff911a9559743af8f21c50602ff6eae4e61af3aeab198d462503, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=0DC111E8D8CA66E16B940EFDF806ACCC1AB588052DF6FCA58C67F3C91957BE53, cn=PRABODH KUMAR Date: 2025.05.17 12:50:25 +05'30'
2025:UHC:4020