APHC010062312003 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] FRIDAY,THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 18983/2003 Between: 1. P.V. SEETARAMAIAH, U.D.C., V.T.P.S., IBRAHIMPATNAM, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. CHAIRMAN MD A P TRANSCO, VIDYUT SOUDHA, HYDERABAD. 2. THE CHIEF ENGINEER ELECTRICAL O M V T P S, IBRAHIMPATNAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 3. THE G M ADMINISTRATION VIDYUT SOUDHA SOMAJIGUDA, HYDERABAD. 4. THE DIRECTOR/ D H R D A P TRANSCO, VIDYUT SOUDHA, HYDERABAD. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue any Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus : i) To declare the orders in Memo No. Ce/DC/DM-V/604-P2/97-3, dated 30-1-1999 along with orders dated 8-9- 1999 in Memo No. CE/DC/DMV/604-P2/97-21 and order dated 23-6-2003 in Memo No. GM(PER)DE/DC/604/97-28 as illegal and arbitrary and set aside the same. ii) To direct the respondents to reinstate the petitioneras U.D.C. from the date of suspension i.e., 24-5-1997 along with all arrears of salary. iii) To give all benefits following out of prayer 1 and 2. iv) To call for records. IA NO: 1 OF 2003(WPMP 23753 OF 2003 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to reinstate the petitioner as U.D.C. pending disposal above writ petition IA NO: 1 OF 2005(WPMP 30509 OF 2005 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to restore the orders dt. 23-9-2005 & post the Writ Petition for hearing, and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. R ANNAPURNA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. S RAVINDRANATH 2. ANUP KOUSHIK KARAVADI(SC FOR APTRANSCO) 3. K.KRISHNABUSHAN CHOWDARY SC For APGENCO 4. (SC FORT SFC ZONE IV) M VIDYA SAGAR The Court made the following: ORDER Despite listing the matter under the caption “for dismissal”, there is no representation for the petitioner. This shows that the petitioner is not interested to prosecute the matter. In view of the above, this writ petition is dismissed for non prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI RR