Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 66059 (PNJ)

RANJIT SINGH v. STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS.

CWP/24684/2015 · 2025-01-23

Aman Chaudhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CWP-24684-2015 IN T 209 Ranjit Singh State of Punjab an CORAM: HON ***** Present : Mr. Mr. S Mr. A for M ***** AMAN CHAUDH 1. Praye to consider the pet 2. The s in terms of the adv had improved the which when on a refer to any averm been submitted to 3. On th petitioner had not at the time of coun 15 (O&M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJA AT CHANDIGARH CWP Date Versus and others HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN C ***** Mr. RS Dhaliwal, Advocate for the pe Mr. Sehajbir Singh Aulakh, AAG, Pu Mr. Abhishek Arora, Advocate for Mr. Ravi Inder Singh, Advocate f ***** AUDHARY, J. (ORAL) Prayer made in the present petition is the petitioner for appointment to the po The solitary argument raised is that t the advertisement ought to have been 5 ed the score to 917 from 885 in the sai on a query posed, learned counsel fo averment made in the petition of the m tted to substantiate the aforesaid. On the other hand, in para 7, it has be ad not been able to produce any proof f counseling thus weightage was give 1 UNJAB & HARYANA ARH CWP-24684-2015 (O&M) Date of decision: 23.01.2025 ...Petitioner ...Respondents AN CHAUDHARY r the petitioner. G, Punjab. cate for respondent No.2. ition is for directing the respondents the post of Punjabi Lecturer. that the marks for Post-Graduation been 5.7131 instead of 5.5312 as he the said examination, with regard to nsel for the petitioner was unable to f the marksheet for the same having has been specifically stated that the proof of having improved his score s given only in terms of his original ents tion s he d to le to ving t the core inal ASHOK KUMAR 2025.01.24 10:13 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-24684-2015 marks to which th marksheet placed 3. Acco 23.01.2025 ashok Whet Whet 15 (O&M) hich there is replication also filed to r laced on record along with the writ pe Accordingly, the present petition is he Whether speaking : Whether reportable : 2 ed to rebuttal the same, nor has the rit petition. n is hereby dismissed. (AMAN CHAUDHARY) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No the ASHOK KUMAR 2025.01.24 10:13 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document