IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT 102 Surinder Kumar State of Haryana CORAM: HON Present : AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL) 1. granted the l sought and recommended by the 29.12.2023, to the Deputy Commissioner at Narnaul, District Mahendergarh, asked the Naib Tehsildar to enquire into it, and vide Anexure P his recommendation. However, Annexure P detailed inquiry. No.3 to take a final decision on the application for renewal of licence in case any document is required, the petitioner will be more than willing IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Surinder Kumar Versus f Haryana and others CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY Mr. Gaurav Mohunta, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Ravi Pratap Singh, DAG, Haryana. AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL) Learned counsel submits that the petitioner had already been granted the licence from 2005 till 2022, the renewal of which he has sought and recommended by the SDO (Civil), Mahendergarh, on 29.12.2023, to the Deputy Commissioner at Narnaul, District Mahendergarh, which was referred back to the SDO (Civil), who in turn Naib Tehsildar to enquire into it, and vide Anexure P his recommendation. However, SDO (Civil) Annexure P-12, has yet again sent the same to the Naib Tehsildar inquiry. He prays that a direction may be No.3 to take a final decision on the application for renewal of licence in case any document is required, the petitioner will be more than willing IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-16207-2025 (O & M) Date of decision: 29.05.2025 ....Petitioner ...Respondents BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY Advocate, Mr. Ravi Pratap Singh, DAG, Haryana. the petitioner had already been , the renewal of which he has SDO (Civil), Mahendergarh, on 29.12.2023, to the Deputy Commissioner at Narnaul, District which was referred back to the SDO (Civil), who in turn Naib Tehsildar to enquire into it, and vide Anexure P-10 gave SDO (Civil), vide letter dated 21.03.2025, 12, has yet again sent the same to the Naib Tehsildar for a He prays that a direction may be given to respondent No.3 to take a final decision on the application for renewal of licence and in case any document is required, the petitioner will be more than willing PARVEEN KUMAR 2025.05.29 17:45 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CWP-16207-2025 -2- to submit the same within the time which shall be granted for the said purpose. 2. Learned State counsel, on instructions, states that respondent No.3 shall intimate the petitioner about the documents required, if any, within a period of 2 weeks, and decide his claim within a further period of 6 weeks from the date of receipt of such doucments. 3. The aforesaid satisfies the learned counsel for the petitioner. 4. Disposed of accordingly. 29.05.2025 (AMAN CHAUDHARY) parveen kumar JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No Whether reportable : Yes / No PARVEEN KUMAR 2025.05.29 17:45 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.