Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Orissa · body

2025 DAILYLAW 66045 (ORI)

GANESWAR MAHALI v. STATE OF ODISHA

WP(C)/32883/2024 · 2025-01-17

Chittaranjan Dash

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P. (C). No. 32883 of 2024 Ganeswar Mahali …. Petitioner Mr. B.R. Barik, Advocate -versus- State of Odisha & Others …. Opp. Parties Mr. S.C. Patra, ASC CORAM: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE CHITTARANJAN DASH Order No. ORDER 17.01.2025 01. 1. Heard learned counsel for Petitioner and the State. 2. By means of this writ application, the Petitioner has sought for a direction from this Court as to why a fresh P.P.O. No.538523 under Annexure-6 shall not be issued by the Opp. Party No.2 reflecting the name of legally married wife of the Petitioner eligible to receive the family pension on death of pensioner and the Opp. Party No.5 shall not transmit necessary documents to the Opp. Party No.2 for issuance of fresh P.P.O of the Petitioner. 3. In course of the submission, the learned counsel for the Petitioner drew the attention of this Court with regard to the representation submitted in this regard on p. 2 08.02.2024. However, it is further submitted that a fresh representation shall be filed within a period of two weeks before the Opp. Party No.5 i.e. Deputy Director, Hydrology, North Division, Balangir with a copy to the Opp. Party No.2 i.e. Principal, Accountant General (A & E), Odisha. In the event, such representation is made, the Opp. Party No.5 shall do well in disposing the representation in accordance with law within a period of two weeks and shall communicate the result thereof to the Petitioner within a period of one week. The Opp. Party No.2 shall reflect the name of the Petitioner in accordance with the recommendation made by the Opp. Party No.5. 4. Accordingly the Writ Petition is disposed of. (Chittaranjan Dash) Judge Bijay