Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 6603 (UTT)

SAKIB v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

BA1/829/2025 · 2025-05-15

Alok Kumar Verma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:UHC:3939 IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR VERMA 15th MAY, 2025 FIRST BAIL APPLICATION NO.829 of 2025 Sakib ..…Applicant Versus State of Uttarakhand ..…Respondent Counsel for the Applicant : Mr. Rajveer Singh, Advocate through video conferencing. Counsel for the State : Mr. Pradeep Lohani, Brief Holder. Hon’ble Alok Kumar Verma,J. The applicant- Sakib is in judicial custody for the offence under Section 3, Section 5 read with Section 11 of the Uttarakhand Protection of Cow Progeny Act, 2007. 2. According to the First Information Report dated 30.04.2025, a secret information was received by the police that Khursheed alias Kala, Aleem, Sakib (present applicant) and others are slaughtering a cow. The police party raided the spot and observed that nine persons were present on the spot. The police party recovered 1000 kg of beef and other articles from the 1 2025:UHC:3939 spot. The present applicant was arrested on the spot. 3. Heard Mr. Rajveer Singh, learned counsel (through video conferencing) for applicant and Mr. Pradeep Lohani, learned Brief Holder for State. 4. Mr. Rajveer Singh, Advocate, submitted that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the present matter. Nothing was recovered from his possession. Despite sufficient time and opportunity, the police party did not call any independent person as witness. Applicant is not a previous convict. He is a permanent resident of District Haridwar, and, he is in custody since 30.04.2025. 5. Mr. Pradeep Lohani, learned Brief Holder, has opposed the bail application orally. 6. Having considered the submissions of learned counsel for both the parties and in the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion as to the merit of the case, this Court is of the view that the applicant deserves bail at this stage. 7. The Bail Application is allowed. 8. Let the applicant – Sakib be released on bail on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two reliable sureties, each in the like amount, to the 2 2025:UHC:3939 satisfaction of the court concerned. ___________________ ALOK KUMAR VERMA, J. Dt:15.05.2025 Neha 3 NEHA BISHT Digitally signed by NEHA BISHT DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=6f1c15b6305912b3f008e9a4a8038ee7326b08b2d0e018b01be753f014836d 27, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=3D89DC33779FB9677068452F32DE6BA960BFE64D819EE44CA9CCE4 87B2FE0F92, cn=NEHA BISHT Date: 2025.05.15 18:23:21 +05'30'