IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.56255 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-377 Year-2024 Thana- PANAPUR District- Saran ====================================================== Rakesh Sahni S/O Kamaldeo Sahni Resident of Village- Rampur Rudra, P.S.- Panapur, Dist.- Saran at Chapra ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Kamlesh Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Mohammed Arif, A.P.P. For the Informant : Mr. Rakesh Mohan Singh, Mr. Ujjwal, Advocates ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 25-08-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, informant and the State. 2. Petitioner apprehends arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2)/115/118(1)/109/303(2)/352/351(2)/3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. 3. As per F.I.R., on the alleged date and time of occurrence, all the F.I.R. named accused persons, including this petitioner, along with 10 unknown persons, entered the room of informant and started looting the valuables. When informant raised alarm, the accused persons assaulted her and her family members by means of lathi, danda, farsa, rod. Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.56255 of 2025(2) dt.25-08-2025 2/3 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that specific accusation of assault is against co-accused Rajeev Singh and Bablu Singh. So far, this petitioner is concerned, allegation of assault against him is general and omnibus. There is no specific accusation of overt act against the petitioner. Case and counter case. Rest of the allegations are ornamental in nature. It is further submitted that similarly situated co-accused persons have already been granted anticipatory bail by co- ordinate Benches of this Hon’ble Court vide Annexure P/3 series. Petitioner claims clean antecedent. 5. Learned A.P.P. for the State as well as learned counsel for the informant vehemently opposed the bail application. 6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, this anticipatory bail is allowed and it is ordered that let the above named petitioner in the event of his arrest/surrender before the court below within a period of eight weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Saran at Chapra in connection with Panapur P. S. Case No. 377 of 2024, subject to condition as laid down under Section 482(2) Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.56255 of 2025(2) dt.25-08-2025 3/3 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. Navya/- (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) U T