KOTAK MAHINDRA PRIME LTD. v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS
CRM-M/30709/2025 · 2025-09-10
Sumeet Goel
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 66009 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 66009 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CRM CRM CRM CRM----M M M M----30709 30709 30709 30709
251 251 251 251
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
Kotak Mahindra Prime Ltd. through Deepak Kumar State of Punjab and others
CORAM:
CORAM:
CORAM:
CORAM:
Present: Present: Present: Present:-
SUMEET GOEL SUMEET GOEL SUMEET GOEL SUMEET GOEL
2.
petitioner stands red withdraw the petition in hand. 30709 30709 30709 30709----2025 2025 2025 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CHANDIGARH CHANDIGARH CHANDIGARH
CRM CRM CRM CRM---- Date of decision: Date of decision: Date of decision: Date of decision: Kotak Mahindra Prime Ltd. through its authorized representative Kumar versus
Punjab and others HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL Mr. Sahil Koul, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Baljinder Singh Sra, Additional AG Punjab. ***** ***** ***** ***** SUMEET GOEL SUMEET GOEL SUMEET GOEL SUMEET GOEL, J. (ORAL) , J. (ORAL) , J. (ORAL) , J. (ORAL) The substantive prayer made in the petition read thus:
“Petition under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for directing the official respondents No.3 to take appropriate action on the on the complaint/ representation dated 27.01.2025 in view of the judgment titled as vs The State of Gujarat vs The State of Gujarat vs The State of Gujarat vs The State of Gujarat 2024 INSC 350 in which it has been that the police authorities are obligated to register an FIR information received prime facie discloses a cognizable offence, keeping in view the facts and circumstances mentioned in the present petition. It is further prayed that necessary directions be issued to official respondents i.e. respondent No.2 and 3 to conduct proper inquiry/ investigation with regard to representations dated 10.01.2025 and 27.01.2025 (Annexure P-6 & P-7), in the interest of justice.
Learned counsel for the petitioner petitioner stands redressed for the present, and thus, he may be permitted to withdraw the petition in hand.
1111 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CHANDIGARH CHANDIGARH CHANDIGARH ----M M M M----30709 30709 30709 30709----2025 2025 2025 2025 Date of decision: Date of decision: Date of decision: Date of decision: September 10 September 10 September 10 September 10, 2025 , 2025 , 2025 , 2025 its authorized representative ….Petitioner ….Respondents HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL for the petitioner. Mr. Baljinder Singh Sra, Additional AG Punjab. The substantive prayer made in the petition read thus: Petition under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for directing the official respondents No.3 to take action on the on the complaint/ representation dated 27.01.2025 in view of the judgment titled as Pradeep Nirankarnath Sharma Pradeep Nirankarnath Sharma Pradeep Nirankarnath Sharma Pradeep Nirankarnath Sharma 2024 INSC 350 in which it has been reaffirmed obligated to register an FIR wherein the information received prime facie discloses a cognizable offence, keeping in view the facts and circumstances mentioned in the present petition. It is further prayed that necessary directions be issued to official o.2 and 3 to conduct proper inquiry/ investigation with regard to representations dated 10.01.2025 and 7), in the interest of justice.”
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the ressed for the present, and thus, he may be permitted to 1111
.Petitioner s Petition under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for directing the official respondents No.3 to take action on the on the complaint/ representation dated Pradeep Nirankarnath Sharma Pradeep Nirankarnath Sharma Pradeep Nirankarnath Sharma Pradeep Nirankarnath Sharma reaffirmed wherein the information received prime facie discloses a cognizable offence, keeping It is further prayed that necessary directions be issued to official o.2 and 3 to conduct proper inquiry/ investigation with regard to representations dated 10.01.2025 and submits that grievance of the ressed for the present, and thus, he may be permitted to MAHAVIR SINGH 2025.09.10 18:44 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/ judgment
CRM CRM CRM CRM----M M M M----30709 30709 30709 30709----2025 2025 2025 2025
2222
3.
Dismissed as withdrawn, accordingly, for the nonce.
4.
Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.
(SUMEET GOEL) (SUMEET GOEL) (SUMEET GOEL) (SUMEET GOEL)
JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE September 10 September 10 September 10 September 10, 2025 , 2025 , 2025 , 2025 mahavir
Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No
Whether reportable:
Yes/No MAHAVIR SINGH 2025.09.10 18:44 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/ judgment