Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 6599 (PNJ)

SANDEEP v. STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER

CRM-M/23293/2025 · 2026-03-17

Kirti Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH C 102 SANDEEP STATE OF HAR 102/2 SANDEEP STATE OF HAR 102/3 SANDEEP STATE OF HAR CORAM: HON Present: Ms. Mr. Mr Mr. KIRTI SINGH 1. This they have arisen o GH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARY CRM-M-23293 DATE OF DECI Versus HARYANA AND ANOTHER CRM-M-27476 Versus F HARYANA AND ANOTHER CRM-M-22644 Versus F HARYANA AND ANOTHER HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE KIRTI Ms. Mahima Dogra, Advocate for th Mr. Anmol Malik, DAG, Haryana. Mr. Harsimranpreet Singh, Advocate Mr. Sahil Nain, Advocate for respon **** GH, J. (ORAL) This common order shall dispose o risen out of the same FIR. HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 3293-2025 (O&M) DECISION: 17.03.2026 … Petitioner ... Respondents 27476-2025 … Petitioner ... Respondents 2644-2025 … Petitioner ... Respondents IRTI SINGH for the petitioner (in all cases). ana. vocate for respondent No.2 (in all cases). ose of the aforenoted three petitions a tions as SWARNJIT SINGH 2026.03.17 17:39 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-23293-2025 and connected cases (O&M) -2- 2. In compliance with the previous order of this Court dated 05.03.2026, the private respondents have come present in Court and undertake to pay the outstanding amount of Rs.20 lakhs to the petitioner. A lump sum amount of Rs.5 lakhs would be paid to the petitioner within a period of one week from now, and the remaining amount of Rs.15 lakhs would be cleared within a period of 5 months i.e. 3 lakhs every month from 01.04.2026 till 01.08.2026. 3. In view of this statement, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that she may be permitted to withdraw this petition at this stage with liberty to revive the same, in case of any violation of the aforesaid statement made in Court. 4. In view of the above, all the three afore-noted petitions stand disposed of. However, the petitioner(s) is at liberty to revive the same, if there is any violation of the aforesaid agreement arrived at between the parties. 5. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of accordingly. (KIRTI SINGH) JUDGE 17.03.2026 SwarnjitS Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No Whether reportable : Yes / No SWARNJIT SINGH 2026.03.17 17:39 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document