Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 65982 (KAR)

APPASO S/O. MAHARAYA PUJARI v. THE GOVT. OF KARNATAKA

WP/101790/2021 · 2025-12-09

M Nagaprasanna

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:17683 WP No. 101790 of 2021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION NO. 101790 OF 2021 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: 1. APPASO S/O. MAHARAYA PUJARI AGE. 35 YEARS, OCC.AGRICULTURE, R/O.JATRAT VILLAGE-591237 TQ. NIPPANI DIST. BELAGAVI 2. ANAND S/O. SHINGADI KHILARE AGE. 25 YEARS, OCC.AGRICULTURE, R/O.JATRAT VILLAGE-591237 TQ. NIPPANI DIST. BELAGAVI 3. NARAYAN S/O. ANNAPPA KHILARE AGE. 37 YEARS, OCC.AGRICULTURE, R/O.JATRAT VILLAGE-591237 TQ. NIPPANI DIST. BELAGAVI 4. SANTOSH RAMACHANDRA KABBURE AGE. 32 YEARS, OCC.AGRICULTURE, R/O.JATRAT VILLAGE-591237 TQ. NIPPANI DIST. BELAGAVI 5. RAYANNA S/O. SUDHAKAR KABBURE AGE. 22 YEARS, OCC.AGRICULTURE, R/O.JATRAT VILLAGE-591237 TQ. NIPPANI DIST. BELAGAVI 6. VITHAL S/O. APPA KARNURE AGE. YEARS, OCC.AGRICULTURE, R/O.JATRAT VILLAGE-591237 TQ. NIPPANI DIST. BELAGAVI 7. MUTTAPPA S/O. HALAPPA KARIGAR AGE. 27 YEARS, OCC.AGRICULTURE, R/O.JATRAT VILLAGE-591237 TQ. NIPPANI DIST. BELAGAVI Digitally signed by RAKESH S HARIHAR Location: High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench, Dharwad - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:17683 WP No. 101790 of 2021 8. LAXMAN S/O.MANIGINI KABBURE AGE. 48 YEARS, OCC.AGRICULTURE, R/O.JATRAT VILLAGE-591237 TQ. NIPPANI DIST. BELAGAVI …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. SRINAND A PACHHAPURE, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE GOVT. OF KARNATAKA REP.BY ITS SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE M.S.BUILDING, DR.AMBEDKAR VIDHI BENGALURU-560001 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BELAGAVI DIST. BELAGAVI-590001 3. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER CHIKODI TQ. CHIKODI-591201 DIST. BELAGAVI 4. THE TAHASILDAR NIPPANI TQ. NIPPAN-591237 DIST. BELAGAVI 5. THE GRAM PANCHAYT, JATRAT REPRESENTED BY ITS P.D.O JATRAT VILLAGE, TQ. NIPPAN-591237 DIST. BELAGAVI …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. T. HANUMAREDDY, AGA FOR R1 TO R4, R5 SERVED) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT OF MANDAMUS TO THE RESPONDENT NO.1 TO CONSIDER THE OBJECTIONS DATED 10/02/2020, 14/02/2020 AND 29/03/2021 MARKED AT ANNEXURE-E, E1, F AND F1 RESPECTIVELY IN SO FAR AS PETITIONERS ARE CONCERNED AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:17683 WP No. 101790 of 2021 ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA) 1. The petitioners are before this Court seeking the following prayer. “issue a writ of mandamus to the respondent no.1 to consider the objections dated 10/02/2020, 14/02/2020 and 29/03/2021 marked at Annexure-E, E1, F And F1 respectively in so far as petitioners are concerned and grant any other relief as deemed fit in the interest of justice.” 2. The prayer of the petitioners is to consider the representation submitted by them. The representation was against an order that allotted 10 acres of land to a third party. 3. The learned AGA on instructions and verification of the records would submit that the order has been recalled. 4. In the light of the recalling of the order, nothing further would survive for consideration of the case at hand. 5. Petition is disposed as having become infructous, reserving liberty to the petitioners to avail of such remedy as available in law in the event of need. Ordered accordingly. Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE RSH / CT: ASC LIST NO.: 1 SL NO.: 17