Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
p. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
ABLAPL No. 14849 of 2024
1. Anurodh Tada
2. Somya Ranjan Tada
…. Petitioners
Mr. R.N. Panda, Advocate
-versus-
State of Odisha …. Opposite Party Mr. S. Panigrahi, ASC
ABLAPL No. 2859 of 2025
Chintu Mangaraj …. Petitioner
Mr. R.N. Panda, Advocate
-versus-
State of Odisha …. Opposite Party Mr. S. Panigrahi, ASC
CORAM: JUSTICE V. NARASINGH
Order No.
ORDER 20.03.2025
03.
1. Since both the ABLAPLs relate to the same FIR, on the consent of the learned counsel for the Petitioners and learned counsel for the State, they are taken up together and are disposed of by this common order. p. 2
2. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioners and
learned counsel for the State.
3. The Petitioners are seeking pre-arrest bail in connection with G.R. Case No.839 of 2024 pending on the file of learned J.M.F.C. (Cog. Taking). Khurda, arising out of Jankia P.S. Case No.388 of 2024 for commission of offences punishable under Sections 137(2) of BNS.
4. Since the offence as alleged is bailable in nature, the ABLAPLs are
disposed of as not maintainable giving liberty to the Petitioners to renew their prayer by filing a fresh application in the event there is any perceptible threat of arrest.
(V. NARASINGH)
Judge Santoshi Designation: Senior Stenographer