1 2025:CGHC:5984 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 935 of 2025 1 - Raju Baghel S/o Samaru Baghel Aged About 63 Years Retired Driver R/o Magarpara Marimai Road Bilaspur, Tahsil And District Bilaspur (C.G.). 2 - Sanat Yadav S/o Hajari Lal Yadav Aged About 71 Years R/o Ambedkar Chowk, Nawagarh, District Janjgir-Champa (C.G.). 3 - Jasanta Khakha W/o Late Bardan Khakha Aged About 65 Years R/o Village Nagra, Post Chandranagar, Tahsil Ramanujganj, District - Balramapur-Ramanujganj (C.G.). 4 - Smt. Ram Bai W/o Late Vinod Kumar Aged About 55 Years R/o Village Kotlipara, Baikunthpur, District Koriya (C.G.). 5 - Smt. Ramrati Devi W/o Late Sikari Ram, Aged About 70 Years R/o Bhatthapara, Ambikapur Tahsil Ambikapur District Sarguja (C.G.). ... Petitioner(s) versus Digitally signed by RAGHVENDRA JAT 2 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Water Resources Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralay Nava Raipur District Raipur (C.G.). 2 - Engineer In Chief, Water Resource Department, Shivnath Mandal North Block Sector - 19, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur District Raipur (C.G.). 3 - Chief Engineer, Mahanadi Godwari Kachhar, Water Resource Department Raipur District - Raipur (C.G.). 4 - Executive Engineer E/m Light Machinery Tubewell And Gate Division, Durg District Durg (C.G.). 5 - Joint Director, Pension And Lok Lekha Department Durg District Durg (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Hemant Kesharwani, Advocate. For Respondent(s)/State : Ms. Ayushi Agrawal, Panel Lawyer. Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 03/02/2025 1. By way of this petition, the petitioner has prayed for following reliefs:- “10.1) That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue the direction for the respondent authorities to grant the benefit of leave encashment. 3 10.2) Any other relief as this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to grant.” 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he may be allowed to withdraw this petition with liberty to file afresh as due to typographical mistake the name of respondents have wrongly been mentioned. 3. No objection from other side. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Raghu Jat