159 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-30355-2025 DECIDED ON: 28.05.2025 BHOLIKAUR .....PETITIONER VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS .....RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MOUDGIL Present: Mr. Aman Kumar, Advocate for Mr. Barjinder Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Jasjit Singh Rattu, DAG Punjab. SANDEEP MOUDGIL, J (ORAL) The jurisdiction of this Court has been invoked under Section 528 BNSS, 2023, for issuance of directions to the respondents especially respondent No. 2 & 3 to consider the petitioner's complaint/statement Annexure P- 1 and to take appropriate steps to decide the same against all the accused person named and to at in accordance with law, in the interests of justice. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he will be satisfied in case a direction be issued to respondent No.3 to look into the complaint dated 08.04.2025 (Annexure P-1) , within a time bound manner. In view of the above, without commenting upon the merits of the case, the petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.3/Senior Superintendent of Police, Amritsar (Rural) to look into the complaint dated 08.04.2025 (Annexure P-1) and decide the same in accordance with law after MEENU 2025.05.29 16:17 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-30355-2025 -2- providing an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and within a period of three weeks by passing a speaking order. The CDR, which is attached to the present petition shall also be considered during the course of considering the above-said complaint. A copy of order so passed be supplied to the petitioner within one week thereafter. (SANDEEP MOUDGIL) 28.05.2025 JUDGE Meenu Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No MEENU 2025.05.29 16:17 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document