Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:113930 Court No. - 82 Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION DEFECTIVE No. - 1857 of 2023 Revisionist :- Devmuni Porwal Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Revisionist :- Anand Pati Tiwari Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Sanjay Kr. Srivastava Hon'ble Sameer Jain,J. Order on Delay Condonation Application No. 01 of 2023 1. Heard Sri Anand Pati Tiwari, learned counsel for the revisionist, Sri Sanjay Kumar Srivastava, learned counsel for O.P. No.2 and Sri Santosh Pandey, learned brief holder for the State. 2. Learned counsel for the revisionist submitted that however, instant revision is beyond time but delay in filing the instant revision has been duly explained in the affidavit filed in support of delay condonation application, therefore, delay condonation application filed by the revisionist be allowed and instant revision should be heard on merit. 3. Learned AGA as well as learned counsel for O.P. No.2 opposed the prayer for condonation of delay and submitted that delay condonation application filed by revisionist is based on vague ground and on such vague ground, delay in filing the instant revision should not be condoned, therefore, delay condonation application should be dismissed. 4. I have heard both the parties and perused the record of the case. 5. The instant revision is time barred and in the affidavit filed in support of the delay condonation application, revisionist only made an averment that delay is not deliberate, therefore, ground mentioned in the affidavit filed in support of the delay condonation application is vague. 6. Accordingly, the delay condonation application filed by the revisionist is hereby dismissed. Order on memo of revision 1. As delay condonation application filed by the revisionist has already been dismissed by this Court, therefore, the instant revision also stands dismissed as time barred. Order Date :- 15.7.2025 KK Patel Digitally signed by :- KRISHN KANT PATEL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad