CRWP-5809 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND 174 Shivom Singh and another State of Punjab CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. Present:- MANISHA BATRA, J. 1. Constitution of India seeking issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the official respondents No. 2 and 3 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners at the hands of respondent Nos. 4 and 5 and take action on their representation dated 24.05.2025 (Annexure P 2. submitted that the petitioners have recently filed a representation on 24.05.2025 before the Senior Superintendent of Police, Patiala raising their grievances as mentioned in the present petition but the same has not yet been considered and no actio this stage, the petitioners would be satisfied if appropriate directions are issued to respondent No. 2 the aforesaid representation filed by the peti thereon. 3. 5809-2025 (O&M) IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Shivom Singh and another Versus Punjab and others CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA Mr. Jatinder Nagpal, Advocate for the petitioners. MANISHA BATRA, J. (Oral) The present petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the official respondents No. 2 and 3 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners at the hands of respondent Nos. 4 and 5 and take action on their representation dated 24.05.2025 (Annexure P At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitione submitted that the petitioners have recently filed a representation on 24.05.2025 before the Senior Superintendent of Police, Patiala raising their grievances as mentioned in the present petition but the same has not yet been considered and no action has been taken thereon. He further submitted that at this stage, the petitioners would be satisfied if appropriate directions are issued to respondent No. 2-Senior Superintendent of Police, Patiala to decide the aforesaid representation filed by the peti Notice of motion. -1 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-5809-2025 (O&M) Date of decision: 28.05.2025 ...Petitioner Versus ...Respondents JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA Jatinder Nagpal, Advocate The present petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the official respondents No. 2 and 3 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners at the hands of respondent Nos. 4 and 5 and take action on their representation dated 24.05.2025 (Annexure P-5). At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the petitioners have recently filed a representation on 24.05.2025 before the Senior Superintendent of Police, Patiala raising their grievances as mentioned in the present petition but the same has not yet been n has been taken thereon. He further submitted that at this stage, the petitioners would be satisfied if appropriate directions are Senior Superintendent of Police, Patiala to decide the aforesaid representation filed by the petitioners and take necessary action 1- 2025 (O&M) 28.05.2025 ...Petitioners ...Respondents The present petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the official respondents No. 2 and 3 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners at the hands of respondent Nos. 4 and 5 and take action on their rs has submitted that the petitioners have recently filed a representation on 24.05.2025 before the Senior Superintendent of Police, Patiala raising their grievances as mentioned in the present petition but the same has not yet been n has been taken thereon. He further submitted that at this stage, the petitioners would be satisfied if appropriate directions are Senior Superintendent of Police, Patiala to decide tioners and take necessary action MOHAMMAD WASEEM ANSARI 2025.05.29 09:17 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRWP-5809 4. present in Court, has accepted the notice on behalf of the respondents and submits that the needful will be done in the paper-book be supplied to her during the course of the day. 5. commenting anything on the merits of the case, the present petition is disposed of at this aforesaid representation dated 24.05.2025 (Annexure P within a period of fifteen days from today, by passing a speaking order in accordance with law. Needless to say, if any th the official respondents would provide them adequate security in order to protect their life and liberty. 28.05.2025 Waseem Ansari Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable 5809-2025 (O&M) Ms. Himani Arora, Assistant Advocate General, Punjab, who is present in Court, has accepted the notice on behalf of the respondents and submits that the needful will be done in book be supplied to her during the course of the day. In view of the limited prayer made by the petitioners, without commenting anything on the merits of the case, the present petition is disposed of at this stage with a direction to respondent No. 2 to decide the aforesaid representation dated 24.05.2025 (Annexure P within a period of fifteen days from today, by passing a speaking order in accordance with law. Needless to say, if any th the official respondents would provide them adequate security in order to protect their life and liberty. 28.05.2025 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable -2 Ms. Himani Arora, Assistant Advocate General, Punjab, who is present in Court, has accepted the notice on behalf of the respondents-State and submits that the needful will be done in due course. Let a complete set of book be supplied to her during the course of the day. In view of the limited prayer made by the petitioners, without commenting anything on the merits of the case, the present petition is stage with a direction to respondent No. 2 to decide the aforesaid representation dated 24.05.2025 (Annexure P-5) of the petitioners within a period of fifteen days from today, by passing a speaking order in accordance with law. Needless to say, if any threat is found to the petitioners, the official respondents would provide them adequate security in order to (MANISHA BATRA) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No 2- Ms. Himani Arora, Assistant Advocate General, Punjab, who is State due course. Let a complete set of In view of the limited prayer made by the petitioners, without commenting anything on the merits of the case, the present petition is stage with a direction to respondent No. 2 to decide the 5) of the petitioners within a period of fifteen days from today, by passing a speaking order in reat is found to the petitioners, the official respondents would provide them adequate security in order to MOHAMMAD WASEEM ANSARI 2025.05.29 09:17 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document