Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 65951 (ALL)

RINKI DEVI v. STATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS

WRIC/27027/2025 · 2025-08-19

Manoj Kumar Gupta, Ram Manohar Narayan Mishra

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:142222-DB Court No. - 21 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 27027 of 2025 Petitioner :- Rinki Devi Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 6 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Vinod Kumar Maurya Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Manoj Kumar Gupta,J. Hon'ble Ram Manohar Narayan Mishra,J. 1. The petitioner claims that she has also inherited the property left behind by her father. However, effort is being made by her mother to get her name mutated to the exclusion of the petitioner. The petitioner is stated to have made representation by post to Tehsildar and SDM and has filed the instant petition for direction to the aforesaid respondents to decide the representation. 2. In case, the petitioner is seeking mutation of her name, she should file proper application as contemplated under law and we are of the considered opinion that on basis of mere representation, the Authorities are fully justified in not proceeding any further in the matter. 3. The writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to move proper application for mutation of her name before the Competent Authority and in which event, it goes without saying that the application shall be considered in accordance with law. Order Date :- 20.8.2025 Mukesh Kr. (Ram Manohar Narayan Mishra,J.) (Manoj Kumar Gupta,J.) Digitally signed by :- MUKESH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- MUKESH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad