-1- 221 221 221 221 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH AT CHANDIGARH AT CHANDIGARH AT CHANDIGARH COCP COCP COCP COCP----2822 2822 2822 2822----20 20 20 2025 25 25 25 (O&M) (O&M) (O&M) (O&M) Date of decision : Date of decision : Date of decision : Date of decision : 06.08 06.08 06.08 06.08.2025 .2025 .2025 .2025 Jagjit Kaur ...Petitioner Versus Ajoy Sharma and others ...Respondents CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE HARPREET KAUR JEEWAN HARPREET KAUR JEEWAN HARPREET KAUR JEEWAN HARPREET KAUR JEEWAN Present: Ms. Simrat Kaur, Advocate (through Video Conference), for the petitioner. Mr. Balwinder Singh, AAG, Punjab. Mr. T.S. Sidhu, Advocate for respondent No.3. HARPREET KAUR JEEWAN HARPREET KAUR JEEWAN HARPREET KAUR JEEWAN HARPREET KAUR JEEWAN, J. , J. , J. , J. (Oral) (Oral) (Oral) (Oral) 1. The instant petition has been filed for initiation of contempt proceedings against the respondents for willfully disobeying the directions passed by this Court vide order dated 26.11.2024 (Annexure P-5), passed in CWP-31570-2024. 2. Reply filed by way of affidavit of Charumita, Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Moga-respondent No.3 is taken on record and para No.4 of the aforesaid affidavit reads as under:- “4. That it is submitted that the Respondent No.3 is not the member of the above said Committee. However, the committee has now granted approval for payment. Now resolution has been passed by the Municipal Corporation Moga in the House Meeting dated 21.07.2025 for payment of Rs.5 Lakhs to the petitioner. In view of the above, the payment has been made vide cheque no.334579 dated 01-08-2025.” 5. In view of the aforementioned submissions made in the affidavit filed on behalf of respondent No.3, present petition stands ATUL SETHI 2025.08.07 16:57 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh -2- disposed of. However, the petitioner shall have the right to file an application for revival of this petition, in case of any misrepresentation in the reply. 6. Rule stands discharged. 7. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand disposed of. 06.08 06.08 06.08 06.08.2025 .2025 .2025 .2025 [HARPREET KAUR JEEWAN] [HARPREET KAUR JEEWAN] [HARPREET KAUR JEEWAN] [HARPREET KAUR JEEWAN] atulsethi JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE Whether speaking / reasoned : Yes No Whether Reportable : Yes No ATUL SETHI 2025.08.07 16:57 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh