Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 65924 (ALL)

CHARAN SINGH @ RAM CHARAN SINGH AND 3 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

A482/17372/2024 · 2025-09-21

Yogesh Dubey Joint Registrar Judicial

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 17372 of 2024 Court No. - 89 HON'BLE JITENDRA KUMAR SINHA, J. 1. Heard Sri Shujauddin, learned counsel for the applicants, Sri S. Naseem, Advocate, holding brief of Mohd. Irfan, learned counsel for opposite party no. 2 and Sri O.P. Singh, learned A.G.A. for the State respondents. 2. This application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been preferred for quashing the impugned chargesheet dated 25.10.2022 submitted in Sessions Trial No. 690 of 2023 arising out of Case Crime No. 283 of 2023 under sections 323, 504, 324, 308 IPC, P.S. Naugawan Sadat, District Amroha pending before the court of learned District & Sessions Judge, Amroha. 3. It is contended by learned counsel for the applicants that the applicants and opposite party no. 2 have entered into compromise and the same has been verified by the learned Court concerned and a report regarding the same is on record. It is also submitted that in view of the compromise arrived at between the applicant and opposite party no. 2, proceedings of the aforesaid case be quashed against the applicanst. 4. On the other hand, learned counsel for opposite party no. 2 has no objection. However, learned A.G.A. submits that the injuries received by the injured are grievous in nature. 5. In view of the fact that the applicants and opposite party no. 2 have entered into compromise and the said compromise has been verified by the learned Court concerned and a report regarding verification of compromise is already on record and keeping in view of the law laid down by Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of State of Madhya Pradesh vs. Laxmi Narayan and others, AIR 2019 SC 1296 and the facts of the matter, it would be in the interest of justice that the impugned proceedings be quashed in respect of the applicant. It was stated that in view of these facts and circumstances, no useful purpose would be served by keeping Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Mohd. Shaafi, Shujauddin Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Mohd. Irfan Charan Singh @ Ram Charan Singh And 3 Others .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) the impugned proceedings pending and thus, the impugned proceedings may be quashed on the basis of compromise arrived at between the parties. 6. In view of the aforesaid, the entire proceeding of Sessions Trial No. 690 of 2023 arising out of Case Crime No. 283 of 2023 under sections 323, 504, 324, 308 IPC, P.S. Naugawan Sadat, District Amroha pending before the court of learned District & Sessions Judge, Amroha are hereby quashed. 7. The application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. stands allowed. September 22, 2025 Madhurima A482 No. 17372 of 2024 2 (Jitendra Kumar Sinha,J.) Digitally signed by :- MADHURIMA GARG High Court of Judicature at Allahabad