Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 6592 (RAJ)

DINESH @ SHALU @ BABA S/O OMPRAKASH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/2257/2025 · 2025-03-12

Ganesh Ram Meena

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:11374] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous 3rd Bail Application No. 1782/2025 Hemant S/o Ramnarayan, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Karjuna, Police Station Mothpur, District Baran. (At Present Confined In District Jail Baran). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, through Public Prosecutor. ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous 2nd Bail Application No. 2257/2025 Dinesh @ Shalu @ Baba S/o Omprakash, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Khedliganj Atru, Police Station Atru, District Baran (Raj.) (At Present In District Jail, Baran). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ajay Singh Yaduvanshi Mr. Jagdish Singh Chauhan For Respondent(s) : Mr. Amit Punia, Public Prosecutor HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order 12/03/2025 1. These bail applications have been filed under Section 483 of the B.N.S.S. on behalf of accused-petitioners in connection with FIR No.119/2024 registered at Police Station Kawai, District Baran for offences under Sections 366, 376, 376(2)(n) & 506 of IPC. 2. Heard. 3. Considered the submissions made at bar and also perused the material available on record. [2025:RJ-JP:11374] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-1782/2025] 4. The allegation against the accused-petitioner Hemant is that on the false pretext of marriage he has made physical relation with the prosecutrix. 5. The allegation against the accused-petitioner Dinesh @ Shalu @ Baba is that when the accused-petitioner Hemant handed over the custody of the prosecutrix to Dinesh, he also made physical relations with her. 6. The accused-petitioners are in custody for last about eight months and the prosecutrix has already been examined before the learned trial Court as PW-1. 7. After going through the statement of the prosecutrix recorded as PW-1 and taking into consideration the fact that the accused-petitioners are in custody for last about eight months, this Court without expressing anything on the merits/demerits of the case deems just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioners on bail. 8. Accordingly, these bail applications are allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioners named above in connection with the aforesaid FIR shall be enlarged on bail provided they furnish a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- together with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for their appearance before the Court concerned on all the dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J Ashish Kumar /37-38