Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 6592 (CHH)

UTTAM SINGH CHANDRA v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

MCC/112/2025 · 2025-02-04

Shri Sanjay Agrawal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:6367 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCC No. 112 of 2025 1 - Uttam Singh Chandra S/o Late Ramdeen Chandra Aged About 54 Years (Now 75 Years), Occupation- Advocate, At- Civil Court, Jaijaipur, District- Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) ... Petitioner Versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through- Its Secretary, Department Of Law, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, Atal Nagar, Raipur (C.G.) 2 - The District And Sessions Judge District- Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) 3 - The Chhattisgarh State Bar Council, Bilaspur Through- Its Secretary, H.Q.- High Court Campus, Above Indian Coffee House, Bilaspur, District- Bilaspur (C.G.) 4 - Tehsil Adhiwakta Sangh Through- The Secretary, Jaijaipur, District- Janjgir- Champa (C.G.) 5 - Shri Umashankar Shukla The President, Tehsil Adhiwakta Sangh, Jaijaipur, District- Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) 6 - Shri Bharat Lal Chandra The Secretary, Tehsil Adhiwakta Sangh, Jaijaipur, District- Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) ... Respondents For Petitioner : Ms. Juhi Anguriya, Advocate For Respondents/State : Mr. Ruhul Ameen, Panel Lawyer For Respondents No. 4 to 6 : Mr. Ajay Kumar Chandra, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justic e Sanjay S. Agrawal Order on Board SHUBHAM DEY Digitally signed by SHUBHAM DEY 2 04/02/2025 1) Heard on admission. 2) This M.C.C. has been filed for restoration of WPC No. 953 of 2021, which was dismissed for non-prosecution by this Court vide order dated 09.01.2025. 3) For the reasons assigned in the application, which is duly supported by an affidavit for restoration of the said petition, I am inclined to allow the same. 4) Accordingly, the instant M.C.C. is allowed and WPC No. 953 of 2021 is directed to be restored to its original number. -Sd/- (Sanjay S. Agrawal) Judge Dey